Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

A window to the world of a cow's stomach

Researchers cannulate cows to study digestion, improve health

Published: Tuesday, December 2, 2003

Updated: Sunday, June 21, 2009 00:06

cow2.jpg

Terry Whitt

Researchers cannulate cows in order to find the best nutritional elements for the animals.

cow1.jpg

Terry Whitt

Brian Moeller, a senior in agricultural engineering, works with a research cow at Waterman Dairy Farm.

Finding the best nutritional elements to feed domestic animals is a high priority in boosting their health. Research conducted at Ohio State is helping to find this combination with the help of cannulated cows.

"Cannulated cows are the same as all other cows in the herd except that they are fitted with an item called a cannula," said Natasha Weaver, a senior in animal science. "Basically, the animals have surgery performed upon them that creates a passageway in the side of the animal so researchers can perform readings on what takes place in the cow's rumen."

Weaver worked as a laboratory and student assistant in the Ruminant Nutrition Department as part of her summer internship at Ohio State.

Cows have four compartments in their stomach with the largest being the rumen. This cavity is the focus of operation for the research with cannulated cows.

The rumen is the part of the stomach where the majority of the animal's digestion occurs, which is what researchers are trying to learn more about. Cows typically consume 50 pounds of foliage per day, and this food sometimes does not provide the best possible nutrient values for the animals, Weaver said.

"We have had an emphasis on nutrition for years because of its importance in regards to milk production," said Maurice Eastridge, professor of dairy nutrition. "By researching what nutrients the cows receive from various feed combinations, we are hoping to improve nutrition recommendations for dairy producers and the livestock industry in general."

The digestion of food for nutrients in the rumen is done by millions of microorganisms. The abundance of microbes also keeps the cannulated cow healthy, often the healthiest in the herd, Weaver said.

"You would think that by having an opening in their sides would allow outside microbes to enter and infect the cows, but with there being such a numerous presence of natural microbes already in the rumen, the new microbes cannot compete for nutrients to survive," Weaver said.

Because these cows are so healthy, some farmers keep a cannulated cow on the farm to help improve the health of the other animals in the herd.

"Basically, the cannulated cows serve as a rumen fluid donor to sick animals. This is done by extracting rumen fluid contents from the cannulated cow and feeding it to the sick cow," Eastridge said. "The microorganisms in the fluid multiply and take the place of the bad organisms in the sick cow and make the cow healthy again."

Some of the other research projects OSU has conducted with cannulated cows deal with the utilization of protein in feeds to reduce nitrogen excretion, and the usage of cereal grain by-products as an alternate feed source for foliage in the animals diets.

Each research project must first be approved by the department and then evaluated to determine if the farm can provide the requested number of animals for the research. A faculty member serves as the principal facilitator for the research with graduate students and undergraduates carrying out the research guidelines, Eastridge said.

"I participated in a study abroad to Australia and saw cannulated cows over there, and I had no idea that this was a research project all over the world," Weaver said. "It's amazing how much we can learn from these animals for the betterment of their health and for product production."

Not many colleges have these animals and Ohio State participating in it is a great honor and privilege."

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

35 comments

Bugs
Mon Sep 12 2011 13:23
Any of you ever visited a cattle auction or a slaughterhouse? Every watched 'em drive cows through a chute with electric prods and bolt 'em in the head? Ever seen a cow stuck in the mud being eaten alive by feral dogs, vultures, maggots? Ever had to put said cow out of its misery with a bullet to the brain? No? Then you have no idea what you're talking about. This is "the cycle of nature:" Everything eats everything else. A cannula is NOTHING compared to some of the other s**t humanity and Mother Nature do to animals.

And remember the alternative to a cannula is killing the cow and cutting open its stomach. In fact, it's killing LOTS of cows and cutting open their stomachs: Feed cow #1, wait 1 hour, kill & cut open; Feed cow #2, wait 4 hours, kill & cut open; Feed cow #3, wait 8 hours, kill & cut open, etc., etc. The cannula is a work of scientific and veterinary genius.

Anonymous
Thu Feb 17 2011 21:30
I think that people are kind of over reacting here, I live on a ranch with cattle. I have a question. Do these cows look skinny or starved? Answer: No. they are doing fine, which means that they are in no harm. these scientists are trying their best. If the cows were in harm, they would be thin and sick looking, because when you are in lots of pain, you tend to go downhill. I think that it would be very wise to let the scientists do their jobs and please, don't diss them. I appreciate what they are doing.
Anonymous
Sun Nov 21 2010 23:26
If it looks horrible-it probably is horrible. How about the weeks of healing with a wide open sore on your side. How can any intelligent person claim that that is "painless". I think it is animal abuse and should be illegal as are other forms of torture to animals. On the Discovery Channel a cow was very tightly squeezed into a vise to allow the "scientists" to stick their arms into her insides (while they chuckled and laughed). Why is such tough restraint necessary unless it was terribly uncomfortable for the poor animal.
Chapelle
Fri Mar 26 2010 17:23
Wait a minute there fellow observers. There IS a reason why they are scientists. They know what they are doing and if they say it doesn't hurt, then more often then not it is painless. It's not like they hired butchers to cut holes in live cows. Think people. Not all Americans are as stupid as everyone else makes them seem.
Anonymous
Tue Mar 9 2010 21:28
Way to go Deb !
Deb in Indiana
Thu Feb 11 2010 17:53
How does this person know they are not in pain. Amazing. Lets put one in them, and see how they feel about it, when they cant speak, cant write, cant sit down with a doctor and say, gee I am in so much pain in my side, and I am nauseated all the time, plus, you can only imagine what it feels like each time they try to put their hands inside my stomach. The pain is terrible Insane! Cows cant talk! Just because they are alive does not mean they are not in pain! Cows have been fine just the way God made them. People like the one above here, feel they can get more milk inside the cow, and more money...that is the bottom line. That is why we only use Holsteins now...because they have the largest udders! Guernseys are on the watch list for endangered species! So are many other cows that used to be popular milking cows on farms. Greed has changed all that. They claim all of this is done for healthier milk, and by the way, docking a cows tail is another thing they claim is for healthier milk, lowering contaminants from the cows tail that can get into the milk. God put that there for a reason - you think? It swats flies away, and gives them relief from the biting pain of flies. ABC news had that special showing how they docked cow tails and it was atrocious cruel, and criminal abuse. I am glad it has been banned in CA and will cheer when it is against the law in every state and part of the world. Wash the udders and the tail, process the milk correctly and you wont have any contamination problems just as has been done forever. Don't claim that any of this makes healthier milk either. It only makes more money, and less work for the dairy farmer. And Hello - there is a lot of difference between a soy bean and a living breathing animal that feels pain. Ask people with colostomy's if it is comfortable and how they would feel if someone put their hand inside of it. Come on now!!! Be reasonable!
Matthew
Wed Dec 30 2009 10:23
Well said Jon, I fully agree.
jack
Wed Dec 23 2009 15:54
Inhumane and pointless.
Mizuumi
Thu Dec 17 2009 18:41
"It's been fine for 5 bazillion years"

You do realize that the cows we breed today are entirely products of artificial selection and would die nigh-instantly if introduced into the wild, right? :U

And I'm still trying to figure out what this mysterious nine-letter F-word that dhammika used is.

Your name
Sun Dec 13 2009 22:12
Lol Jimbo...

All that aside...Let the cow alone...It's been fine for 5 bazillion years without a bloody window in its stomach ( Like I have any damn clue how long the cows been around )...It'll be fine for another 5 bazillion years...We're only doing this because we're too stupid to stop procreating when we're obviously outgrowing our resources...Misanthropy FTW !! \m/

Jon
Sun Dec 13 2009 16:49
Some people seem to think this is for the benefit of the cow.

The whole purpose of this study is in this quote,
"We have had an emphasis on nutrition for years because of its importance in regards to milk production," said Maurice Eastridge,

So this is not to make cows healthier for their own sake but to generate more milk from the cows for human consumption.

So this is really about human agricultural economics and resource management.

This is obviously a touchstone issue that immediately draws reactions on both sides of the fence.

But it is a touchstone issue because it relates to wider topics with broader ramifications. The whole animal rights/ human dominance issue, environment vs economic and industrial interests etc.

Nature manages and regulates itself because all natural ecosystems are sustainable. When they fail to be sustainable the ecosystem collapses and animals die.

So what this all boils down to me is sustainable systems and the fact I have children.

Nature is full of checks and balances that help maintain populations of different animals so that their consumption is not outpaced by resource availability.

So ecosystems are a delicate balance of a myriad of factors that make them sustainable.

Human beings, living the way we do, have really insulated ourselves from these natural processes so much so I would argue that we view ourselves a separate from these kinds of systems, if we even take the time to consider them at all.

One difference with human imposed systems and natural systems is that most human systems are not sustainable.

Waste in nature does not disrupt or destroy an ecosystem but actually usually is the fuel that perpetuates it.

So now how does all my comments relate to our cannulated cow with the supposed "window" into its rumen?

Well good question.

The problem I have with all this is we are trying to produce more food from a living being in order to support man-made systems that are not sustainable in order to combat the diminishing food supply for an ever increasing human population.

This is a band-aid to the real issue of human overpopulation.

I think we should be addressing sustainable agricultural and control of the human animal population rather than squeezing more out of an already taxed system.

So being environmentally aware and resource management conscious is not tree hugging nonsense but being very human centric and selfish.

And since I have kids I owe them an earth that can sustain them, and not just have them inherit all our problems we help create.

foos
Sun Dec 13 2009 15:09
And the word of the day kiddies is liberal. Spell it with me L-I-B-E-R-A-L. It leaves a distinct track behind when it walks, composed of 3 angular lines enclosed by a circle - commonly referred to as the footprint of the American chicken, aka the peace sign. I guess it does suck to be a cow though, they're stupid and they taste good, bad combination, whereas children only taste good. They're much harder to raise in captivity than cows are too. Always whining, so irritating.

Get over it and go form another special interest group. I'm just mad because my leather seats and shoes will cost a little more now because there is a big hole in the middle of the hide that wasn't there before.

Jimbo
Sat Dec 12 2009 18:08
They're now installing these on supermodels so they won't have to purge.
leo
Sat Dec 12 2009 17:55
the difference between this and a human surgery is that human surgery is (usually) done for the person's own benefit, usually in the face of severe if not lethal consequences. this research benefits only us, and not the cows that are subjected to it. the whole basis of human-animal interaction are these philosophical assumptions we carry about man's dominion and position as the "dominant species," which has no basis beyond humankind being too scared to relinquish an authority we've yielded too recklessly or too comfortable to change our lifestyle the smallest degree.

eating meat has no benefit. even if you dont support "animal rights," at least realize how destructive the meat industry is to the earth.

Your name
Sat Dec 12 2009 00:48
all you animal activists can go get gored by a bull. : ]

and as for this article, very interesting!

Your name
Fri Dec 11 2009 18:06
omg.... I have to say that the people who re against this have been extreme ignorant and violent. We live in a society that has a need to do such research. Furthermore the people who voiced their opinion in defense of the cow are obviously out of touch with reality. No one here has ever owned a cow or any animal with large intestines. Also, most of you "animal lovers" are nothing more than crying children. Not only should they continue but we should encourage the pursuit of knowledge. It wasn't like you crazy guy jesus ever gave anyone a handbook on anatomy. Instead, perhaps, we should waste our government money killing people in the middle east.... Hmmmm, i believe that would be much more beneficial than studying cows, you know? Science is the instrument of evil.... as "shelly" puts it. If it were up to you people like shelly, science would be forbidden and only the bible would suffice to solve all the worlds problems.
:)
Fri Dec 11 2009 14:59
this is to what is wrong here... i totally agree! now do i think this is right? no but i do understand it. i am a very big animal lover but i have watched shows on this subject and have been told that the cow are not in any pain while going through this!! it is no different than putting people in studies that decide what foods make us healthier but because cows can't talk and tell us how they feel this is another process. these cows are probably a lot healthier with this thing in their stomaches then the cows out running "free"! so instead of ranting about how this is wrong go out and do something that will help the world!
BritneyTheKid
Thu Dec 10 2009 23:13
HEY. you people are too sensitive.. yeah it looks creepy and yeah the cow didnt 'ask' for it, but people with colostomy bags and tracheostomies look creepy too and guess what...i bet they didnt want them either. obviously there is a way to do these procedures on people to where they can live moderately comfortable lives. im sure it would defeat the purpose if the cow was riving in pain cause im betting it wouldnt eat if it was and that seems to be the whole point behind this experiment... witch is to watch how a cows digestive system works. so stop shedding your tears for the cows and look at the bright side... at least now there important enough not to be turned into burgers^_^
Disgusted human being
Thu Dec 10 2009 19:29
Cows are food and children are not speaks to our ignorance jason. We are all apart of the cycle of nature, therefore we are food to animals as well. Its an animal, it has feelings and thoughts, why dont you let us put in a window in your stomach and see how much you like it? Humans are not above the cycle of nature, we are within it like any other animal, its unintelligence like yours that breed ignorance in our future generations, you should save us all and not procreate.
Your name
Thu Dec 10 2009 15:29
This type of research is too invasive, unnatural and goes down a road I think we should rethink taking. When you first learned of this practice, I am sure you were shocked. Go with your natural instinct. This is wrong.






log out