Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Muggles can't replicate Potter magic

wynalek.2@osu.edu

Published: Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Updated: Friday, June 15, 2012 23:06

There I was, standing underneath the archway to Hogsmeade, the Hogwarts Express stationary on my right. But I didn't travel to the wizarding marketplace by train or floo powder or any other magical means; I trekked through packs of tourists at Universal's Islands of Adventure to get there — the first of many reminders that I was a muggle, a person without magic.

Like many other 20-somethings who grew up reading the Harry Potter series, I had constructed my own version of the wizarding world in my head. That world was intangible, yet perfect. There, Mad-Eye Moody's replacement eye whirred with a life of its own, unlike the plastic strap-on eye that he wears in the Harry Potter movies.

When the books were brought to life on the big screen, my own images of the characters and Hogwarts were infiltrated by the movie sets and actors. I was upset at first but learned to accept it. So when I went to Orlando for a free press trip to the Wizarding World of Harry Potter, I tried to go in without any grand illusions of what the magical world would look like.

At a glance, Universal's Harry Potter world looks just as it should. Old-looking, snow-capped buildings line the cobblestone streets of Hogsmeade, which includes some misplaced stores from Diagon Alley, such as Ollivanders Wand Shop. The storefront windows are full of props, including moving Gilderoy Lockhart books and screeching mandrakes. Moaning Myrtle's voice echoes outside of the women's restroom near The Three Broomsticks. It looks like a perfect movie set, something that Universal Studios has a knack for recreating.

But when I started to walk around, I realized that it wasn't much more than a movie set.

Most of the storefronts are just for show, and those that are actual stores were jam-packed with people buying chocolate frogs and remembralls, which are much less exciting when they can't actually light up if their holder has forgotten something.

The wait was 45 minutes just to get into Dervish and Banges, a store that sells broomsticks, sneakoscopes and replicas of the Monster Book of Monsters; my tour guide said in the summer the wait nears three hours. The Owl Post's window displays stuffed animal owls that I could find at any children's store. And the labyrinth of Gringotts Wizarding Bank is reduced to a single ATM — Griphook and the other goblins would feel insulted.  

I was disappointed, but understood. Magic isn't real, so trying to make it so is underwhelming. I just wish I actually felt immersed in the wizarding world, not just like a muggle buying non-magical souvenirs and watching as others bought sticks that posed as wands. I even wish I hadn't tried the butterbeer, which tasted much better in my head than in real life. It tastes like liquid butterscotch, a bit too sweet for me to stomach, but a friend assured me that the frozen butterbeer was worth a taste.

Where the park succeeds is in its thrill rides, particularly Harry Potter and the Forbidden Journey, which is located inside Hogwarts Castle. The ride uses an HD screen the entire time to make the riders actually feel like they're flying. It's thrilling, and a bit dizzying, all the way through. The wait for the ride queues through the castle, which features talking portraits and a look into Dumbledore's headmaster's office. This is also the only place to get a glimpse of Harry, Hermione and Ron, in a video recording before you get on the ride. If you're looking for character pictures (like those you might get with Donald Duck at Disney World), you won't get them at Harry Potter world, where you won't run into any characters or magical creatures on the streets — just vacationers and workers in funny hats.    

There are only two other rides in the Harry Potter portion of Islands of Adventure: Dragon Challenge and Flight of the Hippogriff. The latter is a tame "family" coaster that won't scare the kids or thrill anyone over the age of 12, but Dragon Challenge is a big-kid ride, where two dragon coasters (a Chinese Fireball and a Hungarian Horntail, for those who speak Harry Potter) race each other for the TriWizard Tournament. Some will recognize it as the Dueling Dragons coaster, which was already at the park but re-themed for Harry Potter.

As a self-proclaimed Harry Potter freak, I was disappointed with my experience — and my trip was not only completely paid for by Universal, but also equipped me with a VIP pass onto all of the rides. It was fun, but I couldn't help wondering the entire time if Disney could have done it better, partly because it has more property to build on and partly because I believe Disney World is actually the happiest place on the earth.

My advice to Harry Potter lovers: Visit the theme park if you have the money to spare (it's $82 for one-day access to one Universal park), but for the real wizarding world experience, just re-read the books and imagine it yourself.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

4 comments

Anonymous
Sun Jan 16 2011 16:05
I was there the week before Christmas and I had mixed feelings on it. Don't get me wrong, I thought the idea was brilliant and quite a bit of fun. My biggest complaint was the number of people there, I think it took something away from it. Yes the shops are supposed to be crowded, but they were packed to the point that parents with small children were screaming at people not to trample them. I don't know how they were going to stop as I was practically getting trampled myself. I do want to go back someday though, in hopes that if it's less crowded I'll enjoy it more. That and I'd really like to get another mug of Butterbeer!
My other complaint was that they didn't have a lot of Ravenclaw gear. Come on, we can't all be Gryffindors and Slytherins!
But in the end, I thought it was brilliant. Looking up at the castle was just awesome, since I've been wishing I could be in a Harry Potter book since I was in 4th grade. I do wonder why they didn't put it in Universal Studios the park rather than Islands of Adventure, as it seems Universal Studios has been losing popularity since Islands opened. In any case, if they're really going to expand Harry Potter, I'm definitely going again!
James
Thu Oct 7 2010 22:18
Just a few things to note:

Disney had a shot at Harry Potter, but only wanted to build a ride similar to Men In Black or Midway Mania and would not dedicate an entire land to Potter. I've seen a lot of people "wondering" if Disney would have done better, and they probably could have, but were very unwilling to commit to the concept.

Also, the ride isn't completely composed of HD screens. It uses large live sets with large AA's, as well.

Universal is now polling visitors about an expansion to the park, which rumor has it is on the fast-track.

Rachel
Wed Oct 6 2010 01:40
I was completely excited when I went. I can't stand the movies, but just to be in some vision of Harry Potter was extremely exciting to me. I'm sorry that you didn't enjoy it much, but I just tried to accept that this wasn't my vision, but it was someone's vision and it made sense. I had a great time, but there were a couple of things I would have liked to see that weren't there. 1) I think they should have made a ride associated with the Hogwarts Express, instead of just having the front of the train sticking out; and 2) I also wish that more of the stores were not just windows. I think they could have done well with a "wizard" bookstore or a shop to buy robes. The craziness that consumed Dervish and Banges also resulted from that being pretty much the main gift shop.

I was very happy to find a Felix Felicis shirt at Honeyduke's; I felt like that was a rare find.
Also, as far as the characters not being there, Rowling specifically nixed their presence in the park. "Minor" characters are allowed, which is why there can be ambiguous Hogwarts students in the frod choir or Beauxbatons & Durmstrang students showing off in the "pep rally."

My experience was also enhanced because when I was there, almost all of the tourists were English, so it felt just slightly more real to me. I highly recommend a trip, because right now this is the only place where you can fully immerse yourself physically in the world of Potter. Though I do prefer the world of the books.

Aleigh
Wed Oct 6 2010 00:57
I was just there on my honey moon 4 days ago, and honestly my husband and I had the greaest time there. We spent three days in park to park but more like a day and a half in the wizarding section. Each time we were there, we saw more things we hadnt seen on the previous day. To be totally honest I compleatly and utterly disagree with your assesment, Every person I spoke to loved the butter beer, the rides may not have been the absolute most but the Props were amazing and the stores were spot on, (The shops are supposed to be crowded), thoughI agree there could be more, I do know that they are removing the lost continent area located right before the Hogwarts Express to expand the section devoted to Harry Potter, So everyone knows... I grew up on Harry Potter, I love it. and I think that Disney (which I also love) couldn't have done better if they had twice the time, if you didnt love it dont go back, but My husband and I whole heartedly recommend Islands of adventure, (Universal Studios is another story) And I can't wait to take our kids there someday.




log out