Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

2 guilty in Steubenville rape, grand jury to examine case for other crimes

mitchell.935@osu.edu

Published: Sunday, March 17, 2013

Updated: Sunday, March 17, 2013 23:03

rape

Halie Williams / Asst. arts editor

A group petitioning for an additional arrest in the Steubenville rape case rallies outside the Ohio Attorney General’s office on March 4.

The two teens charged in the rape of a 16-year-old girl in Steubenville, Ohio, last summer were found guilty Sunday, but Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine said charges could be brought against other people involved in the incident.

Steubenville, a small town along the Ohio River, has gained national attention leading up to the trial involving two high school football players, 17-year-old Trent Mays and 16-year-old Ma’Lik Richmond.

Mays was also found guilty of disseminating a nude photo of a minor.

The teenagers were tried as juveniles, and evidence was presented over four days.

Mays was sentenced to a minimum of two years in a juvenile correctional facility, and Richmond was sentenced to a minimum of one year. The teenagers have potential to be in detention until they are 21.

The teenagers were accused of raping the intoxicated victim during a series of parties in August. The girl said during the trial that she had no memory of the alleged attacks.

While only the two teenagers were charged in connection to the case, that could change, DeWine said. A grand jury has been called and is scheduled to meet on April 15 to determine if other crimes had been committed.

DeWine issued a statement on the verdict in the case and future proceedings.

“A prosecutor’s most important duty is to seek justice. I believe with these verdicts that justice has been done,” DeWine said. “However, this is not a happy time for anyone. Every rape is a tragedy. This is a tragedy.”

DeWine said the issue of rape is a society issue, not just a Steubenville problem.

“Rape is not a recreational activity. We, as a society, have an obligation do more to educate our young people about rape. They need to know it is a horrible crime of violence. And it is simply not okay,” DeWine said in the statement.

DeWine also said investigators have completed 56 interviews to date in relation to the case, including students who were at the party where the rape took place, Steubenville High School officials and football coaches.

Ohio State was pulled into the case after a video taken from the night of those parties, which features former OSU student and Steubenville High School graduate Michael Nodianos talking and laughing about the alleged rape for more than 12 minutes, was released online.

Nodianos was no longer a student at the university through Fall Semester exams on Dec. 12, and his name no longer yields any results on FindPeople, the university directory.

The video, which can be found on YouTube under the title “Michael Nodianos confession #oprollredroll #occupysteubenville Steubenville rape case” and several other names, shows Nodianos wearing an OSU T-shirt making analogies that the alleged victim was “deader than” or was “raped harder than.”

Earlier this month more than 85,000 signatures were given to DeWine by members of the Ohio National Organization for Women (Ohio Now), calling for the arrest of Nodianos because of comments made about the rape.

The law firm of Dennis McNamara, which is representing Nodianos, declined comment.

DeWine acknowledged that Nodianos did not act respectfully, but he told the protestors on March 4 he disagreed that Nodianos’ actions warranted an arrest.

“There’s a difference between what is a criminal violation and what is obnoxious, or otherwise immoral,” DeWine said to the crowd.

Adam Martello, a Steubenville native and third-year in economics at OSU, said he attended the hearings on Wednesday and Friday where evidence such as text messages and an unreleased photos advanced the prosecutor’s case.

“Hearing what those text messages were cleared up a lot of rumors,” he said, adding that he agreed with the case verdict.

Martello called the incident and case “embarrassing to the city and the area” and hopes that it can be put in the past.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

8 comments

Anonymous
Mon Mar 18 2013 13:34
Going to a party with a football player does not give permission to rape. Riding in a car with someone does not give permission to rape. Drinking alcohol does not give permission to rape. (Giving someone a drug in their drink to make them unconscious does not give permission to rape.) Being a "star" football player does not give permission to rape. A woman who is being carried unconscious out the door, or lying unconscious on the floor, is not "pursuing" anyone. When a decent person sees someone who is impaired, they protect them and make sure they get home all right.
Anonymous
Mon Mar 18 2013 11:38
@Anon I believe you're telling THE TRUTH!! I watched too many Naval Academy students lose EVERYTHING because the drunk loose chick didn't want mommy and daddy to know what REALLY happened so she yelled RAPE!!! I still think the OH boys needed to go to jail because it's time for DADDIES to teaches their sons to leave the drunk chick alone...let her be someone else's problem!!! These animals didn't have to take advantage of the situation!! To her mother, while she's giving speeches. TEACH YOUR DAUGHTER BETTER BEHAVIOR AS A MINOR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A1
Mon Mar 18 2013 09:13
They should have been tried as adults so they knew what it was like to be raped in a men's correctional institution. This is merely a slap on the wrist and they will learn nothing.
Anonymous
Mon Mar 18 2013 04:12
co-opt·ed, co-opt·ing, co-opts
1. To elect as a fellow member of a group.
2. To appoint summarily.
3. To take or assume for one's own use; appropriate: co-opted the criticism by embracing it.
4. To neutralize or win over (an independent minority, for example) through assimilation into an established group or culture: co-opt rebels by giving them positions of authority.

Cooption is not rape.

Anonymous
Mon Mar 18 2013 03:38
This girl was a willing participant in this activity. She came all the way from W.Va. to party with these star football players. She ignored the advice of her ex-girlfriends and continued to drink alcohol; then insisted on accompaning the players from party to party, even hitting one of the girls that tried to stop her. At no time did she express objection, not before she hooked-up with these players, nor when she was becoming inebriated, nor while going from party to party, nor the next day when she woke up naked and hungover, nor during the lead-up to the trial or during the trial itself. This rape charge came about, not from her, but when her activities were posted on social media and she became embarrassed when her parents became aware of her activities. At that time she claimed she didn't remember anything that happened and left the guy she pursued all that night hanging in the wind; a year in jail and a 'sex offender' label for life. A real fine young lady she is!!!
Anonymous
Mon Mar 18 2013 03:06
Previous comment edited to reflect the law:
So what is "sex" with no consciousness? This girl was unconscious. In fact, there was testimony that she was unconscious for hours; not one tweet about her consenting, only cooption. It is the same as two people engaging in sex with a "dead" person. No objection is possible when one is unconscious, and this is rape.
Anonymous
Mon Mar 18 2013 02:20
So what is sex with no consent but not objected to? This girl consistently and willingly put herself in a position for everything that happened to her to occur without objection. In fact, there was testimony that she was insistent on being in that position; not one comment about her objecting either before or after she became inebriated, only cooperation. It is the same as two people engaging in sex without speaking a word between them. No objection is tacit consent and not rape.
Anonymous
Mon Mar 18 2013 01:14
Thank you Anonymous and Mike DeWine--- keep pushing .




log out