Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Gene Smith opens up about Ohio State athletics’ ‘glory years’

periatt.1@osu.edu

Published: Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Updated: Friday, June 15, 2012 22:06

genesmith

Cody Cousino / Photo editor

Gene Smith (left), OSU athletic director, stands next to OSU basketball coach Thad Matta (2nd from left) on the field of Ohio Stadium before the OSU football team plays the Michigan State Spartans on Oct. 1. OSU lost, 10-7.

As the scandal that eventually became known as “Tattoo-Gate” unfolded around the Ohio State football program, few people faced more criticism than OSU athletic director Gene Smith.

Tuesday, in an exclusive interview with The Lantern, Smith said OSU’s athletic program was “glad to have (the scandal) behind us,” and was finally moving forward.

“We’re truly in our glory years,” Smith said of the athletic department.

And Smith said that means OSU has learned from previous issues, and has made changes to ensure it doesn’t happen again.

Changes in compliance
After more than 10 suspensions involving the OSU football program in the last year, many have questioned the job performance of OSU’s compliance staff.

Smith said compliance has increased its monitoring of athletes, especially outside of the university. When OSU becomes aware of potential violations, Smith said OSU investigates the matter directly by sending an employee to the place in question.

Barber shops, stores, restaurants — Smith said OSU employees will go to address potential issues wherever they might be.

Smith said this was happening before, but not to the same scale.

“We know some of the bouncers downtown,” Smith said. “We have someone on staff now, when we identify something we send them.”

OSU has also changed how it monitors student-athletes with cars.

“Our car program was under attack,” Smith said. “There was nothing there actually, but we said OK, we could do some things better as a result of that, so we tightened up our registration program for our cars. So we strengthened that significantly.”

Future of college football
OSU football coach Urban Meyer already expressed his apprehension about college football shifting its postseason from the current BCS system to a four-team playoff, and Smith said he has concerns as well.

“The BCS was taken for granted,” Smith said. “It did some marvelous things, particularly for the regular season.”

Despite Meyer’s and Smith’s qualms, the change is under way.

Conference representatives have been meeting to discuss the details, but agreed on adopting a four-team playoff format at the end of each season.

If a playoff diminishes the importance of the regular season and doesn’t adequately take a team’s strength of schedule into consideration, Smith said OSU could potentially change the way the football program schedules out-of-conference games.

OSU has agreements to play traditionally strong out-of-conference opponents like Virginia Tech in 2015 and Oklahoma in 2016, but marquee matchups could become a thing of the past.

“If our ultimate goal is to win a conference championship and to win a national championship, then we’re going to minimize our risk in the non-conference season,” Smith said.

Violations
OSU self-reported 46 NCAA violations committed across 21 sports since May 30, 2011, but Smith said the violations weren’t especially worrisome.

All of the violations were considered secondary, meaning repercussions from the NCAA are unlikely and according to Smith, the number is consistent with what the university normally reports on a yearly basis.

“If we only had 10 (violations), I’d have a problem, because people are going to make mistakes,” Smith said. “That means if I only have 10 out of 350 employees and 1,000 athletes, something’s not right.”

Concussions
Smith said he supported former Buckeye linebacker Andrew Sweat in his decision to walk away from a potential NFL career to potentially pursue law school.

Concussions, which have made national news lately for the devastating affects they’ve had on some former football players, played a major role in Sweat’s decision.

“I’m actually glad Andrew Sweat is going to law school. He’s a smart kid,” Smith said.

In a 2010 interview with The Lantern, Smith revealed that he suffered two concussions during his own playing career.

“I remember them specifically, and I know there are guys who had more than that,” Smith said during the 2010 interview. “So when they’re 60, 70 years old I think they’re going to have problems. So I’m glad that someone’s (the NFL) doing something about it.”

Sweat suffered from concussion symptoms during his time at OSU, and Smith said the issue is something the medical staff takes very seriously.

“No coach has a call on whether a student-athlete goes in or comes out,” Smith said. “If (the doctors) say he’s sitting, he’s sitting. There’s no debate.”

Retire a Buckeye?
Smith is in his seventh year as OSU’s athletic director and said he has no plans of leaving. He said he still has “passion” for his job, but is living “year by year.”

“I intend to retire here as a Buckeye,” Smith said. “You can never say never that you won’t do something else, but as far as athletic director or athletic administration, this is my last stop.”

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

25 comments

Anonymous
Thu May 24 2012 10:24
What evidence do you have to back up any of those claims? What skills is he lacking, citing specific examples of how his performance could improve? Or are you just regurgitating the bias views of ESecPN and emotionally complaining at an easy target? Give evidence, not emotion. You'll make a more compelling argument that way. Unless you have no facts to back up your case.
Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 16:24
You supporters of Smith are absolute lemmings. Pathetic! He is an embarassment to the University. He belongs back at Eastern Michigan as his skills are not commensurate with overseeing the largest athletic department in the country. If you think he "hired" Urban Meyer, you truly are not connected with what is going on at Ohio State. He had NOTHING, absolutely NOTHING to do with that hire. In fact, if he had any self respect he would have opposed the way that was handled. Instead Smith is, was and always has been in preserve his own hyde mode.
Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 16:13
Thank you. That's what I am trying to say. The things that are the job of athletics director (successful teams, revenue streams, attendance, hiring/retaining quality coaches, etc) are things Gene Smith has done very well.
Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 16:11
The machine was not "f'd up" under Gene Smith's watch. Smith came in 2 years after the Maurice Clarrett issue and a mere 8 months before Troy Smith's $500 do-nothing job. Woody got in trouble for giving money to his black players to make up for uneven wages in 1957. Nearly every other school has been caught doing far worse things than trading trinkets for discounted tattoos or working for Bobby DiGeronimo. (Posey was suspended 5 additional games because the NCAA deemed he could not account for 19.5 hours of labor he completed over a 2.5 year timeframe, even though his attorney said they mailed in the applicable time cards.) Fab Five, anybody? John Calipari's final four appearances stricken at UMass and Memphis? The old Southwest Conference and a Trans Am for Erick Dickerson? A new church for Cecil Newton? The aforementioned infractions everyone knows Gene Smith had nothing to do with are pretty minor compared to what goes on other places. While Ohio State has traditionally been on the clean side, there have always been little things going on. Like sending a text message to a recruit's parents regarding which entrance to use at the stadium.
Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 16:10
Actually, he was right when he pointed out the retention of successful coaches like Thad Matta. Matta has received salary increases and bonuses competitive with the top coaches in the country. OSU's basketball practice and team facilities are being renovated under Smith, which will be competitive with any in the country. When the Indiana job opened up, Thad was not interested. Why? Because Gene Smith is giving him everything he needs to succeed nationally at OSU. He has done a good job of keeping the successful coaches and hiring the right people (Urban Meyer) for the positions that open up. Andy Geiger did a great job with the aforementioned facilities.
Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 15:41
The success that you claim would involve Thad Matta and Jim Tressel. Did Gene Smith hire either of these individuals? Did he oversee the renovation of Ohio Stadium? Did he build Value City? The answer to all these questions is no. He was handed a well oiled machine and it was F'ed up on his watch. He is now in charge of overseeing a football program on probation and he doesn't even know the rules. Also, sorry but you WANT to believe the ban would be in place for 2012 regardless because he WANTS you to believe that. The alternative is he is an incompetent moron who screwed the response to the investigation up. By the way, he also failed to monitor the Bobby D matter that resulted in the Failure To Monitor Charge from the NCAA. He's a mess and this department deserves better.
Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 15:37
That's actually a good point. Once you start to look up OSU's records over the last seven seasons, you can't help but be impressed. These comments just go to show how easy a mob mentality can be created behind the safety and anonymity of the computer screen. The media tells us Smith does a bad job, so we start thinking it. That is, until you realize how good we've been the past several years in more than just football.
Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 15:28
You can roll on the floor all you want. But the arguments presented thus far against Gene Smith present no actual researched case against the man. Please provide specific examples of which aspects of his job you feel Mr Smith could have performed better. Ohio State received $27,327,347 in donations in 2010. Ohio State generated $123,174,176 in revenue which was, in turn, expended across 37 athletic programs, resulting in the second most successful athletic department in the NCAA. This is statistically a highly functioning athletic department with enhanced brand value over the past 7 seasons. Yes, there were 46 secondary violations over the past 12 months. The NCAA would be concerned if OSU only turned in 10. By any measure, Ohio State's athletic department is experiencing a period of great success. Again, given the value of perfect information and hind-sight, what would you do different?
Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 15:14
A bowl ban in that scenario (based far more on the Bobby DiGeronimo allegations instead of the oft-reported tat-gate case) was unprecedented. Unbiased observers (read: informed people other than ESPN employees or fans of other schools) were almost unanimously surprised by the bowl ban. Furthermore, after the penalties were announced, the consensus was the NCAA was looking to ban OSU from a bowl in 2012, regardless of whether OSU self-imposed a 2011 bowl ban. Gene Smith had no alternative course of action which would allow OSU to play in a 2012 bowl. It wasn't an "either or" decision between 2011 or 2012. In what way is Ohio St worse off for having Gene Smith over the past 18 months? Since Smith's hiring on 5 March 2005, this athletic department has appeared in 6 BCS bowls (going 3-3), 6 NCAA basketball tournaments (2 Final Fours), finished in the top 10 athletic departments every year, and see the best attendance rates in all sports in OSU history. The video was such a minor violation, it only resonates with those who have a predisposition to dislike Ohio St. The verbal performance reviews as opposed to written reviews are another minute issue. If these are the things people are clinging to in order to argue against Gene Smith, he is doing a pretty good job leading the largest athletic department in the NCAA. Marketing and PR morons don't see attendance rise, merchandising marketability increase, and donations soar on their watch.
Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 15:01
Notice in the photo for this article Thad Matta has a field pass and Smith does not. This is a common occurence at football games and, despite being told about this, Smith continues to violate the rules. This may be a small issue but following the rules works fromthe top down.
Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 14:48
"Almost any school would love to have Ohio State's "joke of an Athletic Director." These were secondary violations (seriously, read some of these "offenses" on 11 warriors) that will not threaten stiffer penalties. One such penalty involved a teenager at a lacrosse camp losing his stick on the way to lunch, and being allowed to borrow one for the afternoon activities. Not exactly violations on par with the $55,000 benefits South Carolina football players received, which was barely mentioned on ESPN. Again, please cite specific examples of what Gene Smith should be doing better, given the athletic department's unparalleled success in his tenure. "

Unparallelled success? We just suffered the worst penalties in the history of the program. Huge success there. Also, he produced a video tape for a specific recruit and didn't know or take the time to find out that it was an ncaa violation. Great start to our 3 year probationary period. He also failed to timely file the supplemental ncaa report resulting in our penalty being issued the week AFTER we ridiculously accepted a nothing bowl bid and now face a ban for this year. Why? Because Gene felt it was unfair for the kids responsible for the violations to not go bowling but didn't think about the kids who had nothing to do with this facing a bowl ban this year. Addtionally, Gene failed to do performance reviews of the coaching staff and was written up for poor performance by the President of the University in the fall. I haven't even mentioned that he is a marketing and pr moron..................

Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 14:43
"Anyone who thinks Gene Smith is doing a poor job as AD of OSU has clearly done no actual research. Watching ESPN and parroting SEC-centric opinions does not count as research. Please provide specific examples of what Gene Smith should do to improve his performance as AD. "

OK Gene. ROTFLMAO

Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 14:40
Almost any school would love to have Ohio State's "joke of an Athletic Director." These were secondary violations (seriously, read some of these "offenses" on 11 warriors) that will not threaten stiffer penalties. One such penalty involved a teenager at a lacrosse camp losing his stick on the way to lunch, and being allowed to borrow one for the afternoon activities. Not exactly violations on par with the $55,000 benefits South Carolina football players received, which was barely mentioned on ESPN. Again, please cite specific examples of what Gene Smith should be doing better, given the athletic department's unparalleled success in his tenure.
Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 14:21
"That issue has already been addressed. Smith didn't think it would be a violation since the video was viewed when the recruit was on his official visit. It's not like he made a video and sent it to the recruit's house."

You have got to be kidding me with that lame explanation. Isn't Mr. Smith charged with the responsibility of knowing and enforcing the rules as they apply to OSU athletics? Why is he guessing when he should know? He is a joke of an athletic director and the department can not be taken seriously until they put somebody in charge who is competent and will not risk the program receiving stiffer penalties during the three year probationary period.

Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 14:19
"That issue has already been addressed. Smith didn't think it would be a violation since the video was viewed when the recruit was on his official visit. It's not like he made a video and sent it to the recruit's house."

You have got to be kidding me with that lame explanation. Isn't Mr. Smith charged with the responsibility of knowing and enforcing the rules as they apply to OSU athletics? Why is he guessing when he should know? He is a joke of an athletic director and the department can not be taken seriously until they put somebody in charge who is competent and will not risk the program receiving stiffer penalties during the three year probationary period.

Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 13:37
Anyone who thinks Gene Smith is doing a poor job as AD of OSU has clearly done no actual research. Watching ESPN and parroting SEC-centric opinions does not count as research. Please provide specific examples of what Gene Smith should do to improve his performance as AD.
Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 13:34
Ohio St just finished 2nd in the Learfield Sports Director's Cup (best Athletic Department in NCAA) in 2011. OSU is experiencing its best run of combined football/basketball success since the early 1960's. Mr Smith has overseen facilities improvements, hired numerous successful coaches in his tenure (Mark Osiecki, Urban Meyer, Donnie Darr), retained successful coaches he has inherited (Thad Matta, Vladimir Nazlymov, Pete Hanson), and improved fan experience in nearly every venue. He has performed his role of Athletics Director very well.
Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 13:05
meechigan sucks!
Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 12:40
"That issue has already been addressed. Smith didn't think it would be a violation since the video was viewed when the recruit was on his official visit. It's not like he made a video and sent it to the recruit's house."

You have got to be kidding me with that lame explanation. Isn't Mr. Smith charged with the responsibility of knowing and enforcing the rules as they apply to OSU athletics? Why is he guessing when he should know? He is a joke of an athletic director and the department can not be taken seriously until they put somebody in charge who is competent and will not risk the program receiving stiffer penalties during the three year probationary period.

Anonymous
Wed May 23 2012 11:36
"How could you possibly have the opportunity to interview Gene Smith and not specifically ask him about doing a video for a recruit that was an ncaa violation. It is incomprehensible to me that an aspiring reporter could miss the opportunity to address that critical issue."
____________________________________________________

That issue has already been addressed. Smith didn't think it would be a violation since the video was viewed when the recruit was on his official visit. It's not like he made a video and sent it to the recruit's house.





log out