Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

New Ohio Union opens with a bang

moore.1732@osu.edu

Published: Monday, March 29, 2010

Updated: Saturday, June 16, 2012 01:06

Inside shot of the Union on opening day

Andy Gottesman / The Lantern

Inside shot of the Union on opening day

union facts and figures

Molly Gray / The Lantern

 More than 16,000 people flocked to the Ohio Union Monday for the opening of the $118 million building. Students, faculty, staff, alumni and visitors gathered for the ribbon-cutting ceremony before the doors opened at noon.

Shortly before noon, a countdown began, punctuated with drumbeats from the Ohio State Marching Band. At zero, the doors opened and fireworks exploded as students pressed through the entrance on the west plaza.

Students Julie Knox, a fourth-year in medical dietetics, and Zack Rubin-McCarry, a fourth-year in political science and strategic communication, were part of the ribbon-cutting ceremony that also included Ohio State President E. Gordon Gee and Tracy Stuck, the director of the Union.

Knox is the president of the Pan-Hellenic Council, and Rubin-McCarry is the president of the Inter-Fraternity Council. Knox said they found out before spring break that they would be official ribbon-cutters.

"Every time I hear about the Union, there's something new I learn," Rubin-McCarry said, adding that he looked forward to getting to know the new building.

Gee posed for pictures in the Great Hall, as it quickly filled with visitors.

"Every great house has to have a living room," he added, "and this is our house, and this is our living room."

Tracy Stuck, the director of the Union, was perched at a table on the second floor overlooking the Great Hall.

"I'm just staring at people," she said, adding that words couldn't describe her excitement.

Rooms were crowded and lines were long.facts and figures

Lines for free food in the Archie Griffin Ballroom snaked across the 18,000-square-foot space. Red tote bags, 6,000 in all, had been completely given away by 1:30 p.m. Tony the Tiger helped give away Kellogg snacks in the Ohio Stater Traditions room on the second floor, and Brutus Buckeye posed for pictures.

BuckID replacements, normally $20, were free in the new office on the second floor.

Jordan Davis, vice president of Undergraduate Student Government, said she was excited to see all the students in the Union and hoped to continue to see students there throughout the quarter.

She added that she hopes the new Union will get more students motivated to become involved in student organizations and that it will become the central gathering place for students on campus.

A lot of work was done over spring break to prepare for opening day, Kurt Foriska, assistant director of the Union, said. "I swear people were working 24 hours a day," he joked.

Despite a forecast of rain and cloudy skies and a protest by architecture students, whose neon-colored signs deemed the building an architectural "failure," Foriska said the day was a success.

He said he hoped students, even those involved in the protest, would come to the Union and "find their niche."

The festivities will continue throughout April with concerts, lectures and other events. "We just want to get students in the building," he said.

Many student organizations will have their first meeting in the Union in the coming month, and Foriska said the Union staff will be welcoming them.

He said, "The whole goal is to get students here to see how to use the building."

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

12 comments

Anonymous
Sun Apr 18 2010 13:36
I find it depressing that people that know nothing about architecture are calling this building "traditional". Just because it is brick does not mean it is a traditional style campus building. Those ugly grey bars on the window are not traditional, nor are the randomly placed circular rooms, nor is the irregular and carelessly thrown together shape (blob). As the leader of the protest said, brick can be implemented into modern designs, or even be the main material. By modern I do not mean 1970s modern like lincoln and morrill, or denney hall. What were the designers thinking with the angular windows on the large bay in front? Was that supposed to be modern?
All that said, I do not think a modern building of glass would have been a good choice either. The RPAC is in a less historic part of campus, so it is the main focal point for that area and therefore a good choice for the location of a glass building(distracts from the two giant towers as well). My feeling is that the union needed to be brick, but
should have had a shape that let students flow through to high street more directly, and without windows that try to emulate a style that they are not.
The Business school is another poor example of architecture, although not as bad. The brick on that building at least has some ornamental patterns and the overall design is closer to being "traditional" than the union. But still it is very generic and uninteresting, unlike true traditional buildings with character like orton or bricker.
If OSU students want a good example of modern architecture blending well with traditional they have a beautiful example on campus in the thompson library renovation.
For those calling Knowlton hall ugly, they probably are referring to the white marble or the unfinished (purposely) cement interior. The white marble was a demand by the person that provided the money for the building. Many architecture faculty liked the shape but wanted brick facade. The inside looks the way it does so that the building itself can be a teaching tool for its students. The building has won awards more because of the layout and organization of interior space. I've got to agree with the icicle problem comment though.
Anonymous
Wed Mar 31 2010 15:07
In response to the previous comment, Knowlton Hall won the AIA Architecture Honor Award, arguably the highest honor of the profession. "Ugly" is merely a surface reading of something much more abstract.
Anonymous
Wed Mar 31 2010 12:48
Architecture students protesting? Knowlton Hall is one of the ugliest buildings on campus. Must be jealous.
Anonymous
Tue Mar 30 2010 22:38
"As architects, you will find that most of what people want is the ordinary, regular, expected, and comfortable."

If people truly believe this to be true, than this is a sad statement about the world we live in. If this is true, then why try as a society to build anything great.. ever. If people feel this way -- and as evidenced by the commentary surrounding the protest -- then people clearly wouldn't mind tearing down the great historical monuments of the world. Afterall, most great pieces of architecture around the world were hated by the public when they were built.

In fact, it's the unordinary, irregular, and unexpected that makes a city so interesting. These are the moments that inspire and awe a city's visitors, and instill pride in its citizens.

Anonymous
Tue Mar 30 2010 15:36
To define Columbus and Ohio with the words "tradition, stability and middle-America" is to grossly underestimate the richness and vibrancy of the cultural discourse that exists in this amazing state! The union suggests an image of Ohio and of Ohio State that is mere facade in very much the same way that the new Ohio License plates suggest a singular image of Ohio as a rolling agrarian landscape; both ignore the complexities and contradictions of one of the most fascinating parts of America. I cannot put words to describe the pride I feel for The Ohio State University, but as an Architect I struggle to feel anything but shame and disappointment in the missed opportunity the Union presented not only to The Ohio State University but to Columbus, Ohio and to the Architectural discourse. Imagine if the same aspirations were appended to the union as were to the Wexner Center; the result could have been beyond unparalleled!!!
Anonymous
Tue Mar 30 2010 13:35
Looking forward to seeing it tomorrow with my kids
Anonymous
Tue Mar 30 2010 12:49
So that 'green initiative' starts after Ohio State renovates every major building on campus? I mean the Union doesn't even have auto-dimming lights with all the windows or recycle bins! Good thing there are TVs everywhere.
Anonymous
Tue Mar 30 2010 12:04
Ohio State athletic band
alum
Tue Mar 30 2010 09:31
I worked in the union as a student in 1980-81, so I saw every part of it. "Boring" architecture? Absolutely. It needed to be changed, and I contributed to the effort. I didn't expect the new building to be an amazing monument to cutting-edge architecture. After all, the Union needs to be an expression of the OSU personality. Tradition, stability, middle-America is what Ohio is, Columbus is. Students, these are not bad things. As architects, you will find that most of what people want is the ordinary, regular, expected, and comfortable.
Anonymous
Tue Mar 30 2010 08:56
LOVE the first comment.
BuckeyeGrad
Tue Mar 30 2010 01:40
The architectural students' dress... black, gray, with a hint of "blue" jean. (YAWN!) The use of one dominant color (black) makes the group look "too conservative." I vote "Fail." The Columbus gray sky is more progressive and visually appealing. LOL What's next on the Knowlton Hall kids' "list of "things to do"? A Fred Phelps funeral protest? Maybe these students don't know what a Union is since they've been without one for three years.
Anonymous
Tue Mar 30 2010 00:12
Another milestone for our great university.




log out