Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

No challengers: One-sided Ohio State election a rarity

mitchell.935@osu.edu

Published: Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Updated: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 23:02

stepp

Kristen Mitchell / Campus editor

Taylor Stepp, USG president and a third-year in public affairs, is running unopposed for reelection.


For the first time in almost 50 years, an Undergraduate Student Government presidential candidate is running unopposed. For the first time in about 10 years, Ohio State students are expected to elect a two-term president.

USG President Taylor Stepp, a third-year in public affairs from Jackson, Ohio, is the only presidential candidate slated to be on the ballot when students can start casting their vote on Feb. 27. That hasn’t occurred since 1966.

But 50 years ago when Tim Neustadt ran as the only presidential candidate for Student Senate, which would become USG, things were different. USG was controlled by two political parties, the more conservative Buckeye Political Party and the liberal Student Congress Party, and the election wasn’t really unopposed.

In 1966 Neustadt, a junior at the time, wasn’t running against a candidate, he was running against the Free Student Federation referendum put forth by the Student Congress Party, calling for the abolition of the Senate.

Student government was at a crossroads.

The polarization of students was a direct reflection of the ongoing war in Vietnam, said Neustadt, now 67 and living in Los Angeles.

“The war was very real to the average student,” he said in an interview with The Lantern. “It was the ‘60s, everything was being challenged … it was very alive.”

With the threat of being sent to war if men didn’t perform well in school, Neustadt described the vibe on campus as tense at times.

“Nobody trusted anybody, nothing was the same as it traditionally was,” he said. “The campus wasn’t all about football and fraternities and dating and getting out in four years and entering the real world.”

If you weren’t in school, you were going to the military. You were going to war, he said.

According to The Lantern archives, 4,814 votes were cast for the Free Student Federation referendum, but it wasn’t enough to disband Student Senate as the Student Congress Party had wanted.

With Neustadt’s presidency secured, student body leadership was on a path for change.

More than 10,500 students voted in the 1966 Student Senate election, which, according to a 1966 Lantern article, set a voter turnout record that has only been topped once, with more than 13,000 voting in the 1972 election, according to data on past USG elections.

When Stepp ran against three other candidates for president in the 2012 USG election, turnout was at its highest since 1975 with 8,279 ballots cast.

Stepp said running unopposed gives him the opportunity to focus on doing his job without getting caught up in the election, but Neustadt said it isn’t the best circumstance for the university.

“The good news is he’s going to win, the bad news is he’s going to have to look at himself and say, ‘What did I earn?”’ Neustadt said.

The question could pose a challenge for the incumbent.

“He’s going to have an easier election than I did, but he may have a harder term. I sure knew where people stood,” he said. “Apathy is tough.”

Eddie Pauline, who was elected as USG president in 2001 and 2002, is the last person to hold the USG presidency for two terms. Pauline returned to the university more than three years ago and works as the director of the Buckeye Leadership Fellows Program, a Student Life-run program.

While Pauline was “thrilled” to see Stepp have the opportunity to run for re-election, he said he was disappointed to see that no other candidates chose to run.

“I’m shocked no one was interested in running,” he said.

As a two-term president, Pauline said Stepp’s familiarity with campus operations will allow him to accomplish more during his second term because there won’t be the learning curve that comes with presidential turnover.

“You can really focus on policy and making the changes you want to make,” he said.

According to past election results, there have been four two-term USG presidents, including Ohio Treasurer Josh Mandel, who was elected in 1998 and 1999. Mandel ran against Democratic Senator Sherrod Brown for a U.S. Senate seat last November, but lost to the incumbent.

In a Wednesday interview with The Lantern, Mandel called Stepp a “strong leader with compassion and intelligence,” and had some advice for the candidate.

“Always do the next right thing, regardless of political pressure, regardless of media pressure. Just do right,” Mandel said.

The lack of interest or follow through with candidacy, Pauline said, could be detrimental to USG’s future and student wellbeing.

“My concern is that if students aren’t running this year, will the trend continue?” he said. “You can either look at it as a vote of confidence or an engagement issue.”

Former USG presidential candidate Niraj Antani prefers the first option.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

20 comments

Brutus
Thu Feb 21 2013 11:38
The only people on campus that care about USG.. are the self promoting people in USG. That is all.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 19 2013 10:39
"USG is nothing but a high school clique. Why are all the directors, deputy directors and senior staff juniors, the same year as Stepp. All his friends maybe? Why is Stepp taking credit for everything USG Im sure it is not all him, what about the cabinet members who come up with those projects and directors and VP? I would like to see some second and third years along with them fourth years appointed to directors, deputy directors and senior staff positions. Can we see that Stepp? Can we see what USG really does? Can you give us a reason to believe in you and your minions?"

About half of the directors are seniors or graduating. While you want 2nd years, it's hard to put someone into a director or Senior staff position because they won't necessarily have the knowledge to know how the University works. While that shouldn't ban anyone, it will be hard to make the case for a sophomore over certain juniors and seniors. When you get to Seniors, there is the problem with senioritis and the fall of that's associated with that. Juniors have the drive to stay motivated and to continue serving students. It's not fair to attack the make-ups unless you have examples of people that have performed poorly.

Anonymous
Fri Feb 15 2013 20:16
To clarify I would like to see some second and third years along with them fourth years appointed to directors, deputy directors and senior staff positions next year.
Anonymous
Fri Feb 15 2013 20:14
USG is nothing but a high school clique. Why are all the directors, deputy directors and senior staff juniors, the same year as Stepp. All his friends maybe? Why is Stepp taking credit for everything USG Im sure it is not all him, what about the cabinet members who come up with those projects and directors and VP? I would like to see some second and third years along with them fourth years appointed to directors, deputy directors and senior staff positions. Can we see that Stepp? Can we see what USG really does? Can you give us a reason to believe in you and your minions?
Anonymous
Fri Feb 15 2013 17:09
Anonymous Fri Feb 15 2013 12:08, if you are a member of USG or a graduating member of USG, you should be ashamed of yourself.
Anonymous
Fri Feb 15 2013 12:08
If you seriously think that senate members hold as much power as the USG President and Vice President...or some cabinet members, you should go talk to some people. I'm very familiar with how USG works and just because something is written on a piece of paper regarding how something should work, doesn't mean it actually happens in practice. Why would someone post information and facts that Stepp has said when he and his supporters are so quick to call slander or accuse others of doing false things to save their own asses.

"There is no monopoly on power". When the power he holds is solely because students voted for him, he needs to be held responsible for actions. He surely holds monopolies, especially in an organization that is supposed to be a system of checks and balances.

Anonymous
Fri Feb 15 2013 12:02
Most of the comments, whether there is merit in what they say or not, are rather appalling. Some of these comments show that people are unfamiliar with the structure of USG. There is no monopoly on power. As well, if you make claims, you have to back them up with facts and examples. What beliefs, what claims? Who was alienated?
Anonymous
Fri Feb 15 2013 10:51
What is actually severely upsetting is that "anchor babies" is far from the most offensive and politically incorrect comment I have heard come from his mouth. It's sad that he so effectively bullied people into not running that he now has another year of monopoly over USG to use solely as a platform for his aspirations at holding political offices later in life. I'm all for people having political opinions or identifying with parties, if that's what they so chose, but Stepp's conservative ideas border on offensive and alienate groups on campus; something a USG President should actively avoid doing. The lantern can put a blurb or two in about what "he" has done, but truthfully....none of those things were completely his doing, no matter how much he'd like to claim they were.

I wish people wouldn't have given in to his bullying, because some of the people considering running would have done an amazing job.

Anonymous
Fri Feb 15 2013 10:24
I know for a fact that Stepp bullied at least 3 candidates from running
Anonymous
Fri Feb 15 2013 09:29
I'm sure there was some bullying by Stepp that kept other candidates from forming slates.
Anonymous
Thu Feb 14 2013 17:32
Im not to fond of Stepp myself. Sounds like he bullied everyone in USG from running against him, anyway who are they what have they done for Ohio State? Why do we pay this kid?
Anonymous
Thu Feb 14 2013 16:00
I'm trying to comprehend anon 15:29's comment and determine its relevancy. So far I find no relevancy.
Anonymous
Thu Feb 14 2013 15:29
Having earned several degrees from OSU and served on the student senate as a freshman at the University of California at Berkeley in the 1960s, I can speak from personal experience about senate effectiveness. The senate and students were at the opening stanza of the Free Speech Movement at Cal when I was there. The senate was attempting to get permission to allow Malcolm X to exercise his right to free speech on campus. We were going to petition the administration (President Clark Kerr and Chancellor Strong) to allow this to happen. Shortly after we came up with this idea, Mario Savio and Betina Aptheker and others began the first sit-in in front of Sproul Hall, the administration building. Eventually, the movement took hold. My point is this: the student senate would still be handing out petitions more than 50 years later in order to allow a controversial speaker on campus if the FSM had not emerged. Peaceful demonstrations made the difference. Can something like the USG make a difference? Of course. Will they? It depends on the need for campus organizational change and the leadership provided. One person is not likely to make much difference without a felt need for change. This is pretty standard stuff for managing change. My larger concern, however, is that Josh Mandel an ultra-right-wing misguided conservative obstructionist has recommended Taylor Stepp for the USG. Mr. Stepp's only saving grace is that he is from Jackson, the same place my wife grew up and lived.
Anonymous
Thu Feb 14 2013 14:23
wait what does usg even stand for???? is that like a real thing????
Anonymous
Thu Feb 14 2013 14:17
Who even cares? It's pretty obvious in everything he's done that Stepp is just using this is a platform to get involved as a Republican in elected politics in Ohio. I wish we actually had a student government president who did it for bettering students' lives rather than furthering his own ambition.
Anonymous
Thu Feb 14 2013 13:53
Does USG even do anything?
Anonymous
Thu Feb 14 2013 12:13
This same president who loves referring to children of "illegals" as "anchor babies" in public affairs classes
Anonymous
Thu Feb 14 2013 10:12
It's nice to see Stepp doing something good instead of asking girls for naked pictures.
Anonymous
Thu Feb 14 2013 08:39
With the large number of political science majors at OSU it is appalling that so few are involved in student government-- what's up with that?
Anonymous
Thu Feb 14 2013 08:02
How many executive orders did he issue in his first term?




log out