Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Ohio State considers 100% tobacco ban

klein.340@osu.edu

Published: Sunday, October 7, 2012

Updated: Sunday, October 7, 2012 23:10

Smoking

Lantern file photo

OSU is considering banning all tobacco on campus.

Students, staff and faculty who are smokers at Ohio State might have to put away their cigarettes and lighters, as the university is considering moving to a 100 percent tobacco-free environment.

“Our goal is to become the healthiest university on the globe,” said Bernadette Melnyk, the dean of the College of Nursing, in an email. “It will improve everyone’s health and wellness. Smoking is the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality in the U.S.”

Tobacco use would be prohibited anywhere on university property including extension offices and regional campuses, she said but added that off-campus areas would not be affected.

“Smoke-free policies and norms reduce the initiation, prevalence and intensity of smoking in young adults,” she said.

Faculty and staff would also have to comply with the new policy if accepted, Melnyk said.

“Workplace smoking bans reduce the prevalence of smoking and daily cigarette consumption,” she said.

Support was generated from faculty, staff and students for the university to become tobacco-free since the Wexner Medical Center did so in 2006, according to the OSU’s tobacco-free proposal website.

Recommendations for universities and colleges to go tobacco-free have also been made from the Ohio Board of Regents, the Ohio Board of Education, the State of Ohio Healthy Ohio Program and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, according to the website.

While tobacco usage would be prohibited, OSU would also reduce its association with the tobacco industry, Melnyk said. “(There will be) no tobacco advertising on university property, at events or media,” she said, adding that donations, gifts or sponsorships that are associated with the tobacco industry would not be accepted, except for research.

The university will be holding university-wide discussions that include three open forums on campus that are open to students, staff and faculty and a teleconference for those who are not located in Columbus, according to the website.

The open forums take place in the Science and Engineering Library Room 090. The first forum is on Monday, at 10 a.m. with the second forum on Oct. 15, at 9 a.m. and the final one on Oct. 18 at 2:30 p.m. The teleconference is on Tuesday, at 1 p.m. but those wishing to participate must register on the website.

Officials hope the final decision will be approved in November and December, with the implementation of the new policy going into effect for Spring Semester, according to the website.

If approved, “a broadly representative implementation committee of faculty, staff, students and community members will be appointed,” Melnyk said. The committee would “seek advice and feedback on communicating and managing the change, facilitate and monitor the change process (and) revise (the) nonsmoking policy (through) the university policy process,” she said.

However, not all students support the proposal.

“We’ll have to walk all the way down to High Street for one cigarette,” said Younghoo Yoo, a third-year in logistics management. Yoo said there needs to be a space for faculty and students to smoke on campus.

On the other hand, some students support the proposal.

“I would appreciate it if it became more tobacco-free,” said Jennifer Keller, a third-year in materials science and engineering. Keller said tobacco usage is harmful to others and smells bad.

More than 26 percent of adults ages 18 to 24 in Ohio are smokers, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

17 comments

Michael J. McFadden
Fri Oct 19 2012 04:37
Well, it's been a week and I see that Tina Komers, after leaving an attack aimed at me, has not come back to share any details about her funding and activities in the area. Wonder why? Although I will give her credit for using her real name at least: a lot of the more professional antismoking activists seem to have been making increasing appearances on internet boards in the past year under anonymous handles: all part of their new push into trying to capture the "social media" as solidly as they've captured the televised media and a good bit of the print media.

They have trouble in this medium however: their identities (or lack of them) and their funding and the falsities of their arguments are too easily exposed. Boards like this can't be controlled by promises of grant money and staff salaries, and sound-bite arguments are too easily shown to be as hollow as an empty egg shell.

So, anyone have any updates on what's happening with OSU?

- MJM

Michael J. McFadden
Thu Oct 18 2012 01:53
Thank you Daniel. Unfortunate. I'd seen that notice at some point and it got lost amidst the rest of what I've been trying to keep up with. :/ I would have GREATLY enjoyed the opportunity to ask a few questions in the teleconference. If you see any other discussion boards that I could add something to please let me know. I'm at Cantiloper over on the gmail system.

- MJM

Daniel Labarowski
Wed Oct 17 2012 21:43
MJM,

"The university will be holding university-wide discussions that include three open forums on campus that are open to students, staff and faculty and a teleconference for those who are not located in Columbus, according to the website.

The open forums take place in the Science and Engineering Library Room 090. The first forum is on Monday, at 10 a.m. with the second forum on Oct. 15, at 9 a.m. and the final one on Oct. 18 at 2:30 p.m. The teleconference is on Tuesday, at 1 p.m. but those wishing to participate must register on the website."

Looks like we missed the opportunity. :(

Michael J. McFadden
Wed Oct 17 2012 18:04
Daniel, you wrote, "A shame I did not read this soon enough to go to the open forums" What open forums were there on this? I would like to see them.

- MJM

Daniel Labarowski
Wed Oct 17 2012 16:43
I have read a lot of ridiculous proposals from Ohio State's administration, but this one takes the cake. Since when does a university have the right to make health/lifestyle decisions for their students. Of course there is good reason to ban smoking at the medical center, their are sick people and sensitive equipment their - and how would they evacuate in the event of an accidental fire? However, this is by no means a precedent for a smoking ban on campus. The university is funded by tax dollars and tuition and its smoking policies should reflect the views of its population, not some healthy lifestyle agenda.

As has already been pointed out, its very unlikely that smoking is the leading cause of death. The CDC states cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morality (I realize that the Cleveland clinic links smoking and heart disease, but they also link oral contraceptives and heart disease.... statistics with little medical backing). Many would argue that this is due to obesity. Respiratory diseases are significantly lower. What's next, a ban on unhealthy foods? Never. The university is able to extort way too much money from us through its overpriced mealplans for them to even consider this.

A shame I did not read this soon enough to go to the open forums. i would have been interested in hearing how anyone could justify this.

Michael J. McFadden
Fri Oct 12 2012 23:49
Tina Komers, thank you for noticing my efforts! :) I do indeed try to help out people wherever I find them battling against the well-funded and highly organized antismoking advocacy groups. I'm quite open about who I am and what my interests and motivations in this are, and people are welcome to visit my website at Antibrains dot com and read my bio and the Author's Preface there. Would you care to be similarly forthcoming? Your TobaccoFreeCampus site looks to be about as well-funded as the national SmokeFreeCampuses group: are you affiliated?

Something that students are unlikely to hear from you or your groups though is an accurate assessment of what you would call the "dangers" of smoking on campuses. Would you like me to lay out the calculations based on teh EPA Report itself showing that a student would have to walk through a doorway surrounded by smokers every day for roughly 250 *MILLION* years to get lung cancer (on average of course) from the experience? Or perhaps you'd like to explain just why your groups are so totally dead set against the possibility of schools providing comfortable, safe, separately ventilated indoor smoking arrangements for their students and staff who smoke?

Looking forward to your response Tina.

- MJM

Tina Komers
Fri Oct 12 2012 10:44
Michael J.McFadden trolls these pieces across the nation, frequently propagandizing. If you want honest information, try TobaccoFreeCampus.org.
Michael J. McFadden
Wed Oct 10 2012 18:07
Anon wrote, "Perhaps the extra grant/blackmail money the university receives for enacting such bans is not worth risking the lives of students who refuse to go along with the policy." Anon, if you look over the history of the antismoking movement I think you'll find that they view such problems as just "collateral damage." There was one university out in the Midwest (?) a few years ago where a student fell off a ledge outside a dorm window while smoking and fell 8 floors to his death. A security guard there noted that it was a common practice for students to do that sort of ledge smoking after the ban. Think the university changed its policy? Of course not.

- MJM

Anonymous
Wed Oct 10 2012 17:00
I don't smoke cigarettes, but I do enjoy hookah a few times a month. It doesn't smell bad and doesn't bother anyone I've ever met.
Anonymous
Tue Oct 9 2012 21:44
What is your plan for students who do not quit smoking and leave campus to do so? As the mother of a sophomore (a non-smoker) and as a proponent for safe campuses for all students, I can say that if my child ventures into dark and sometimes dangerous neighborhoods to smoke because your rules prevent him/her from smoking outside in a relatively safer environment, I will have some major problems with the university. It is not the university's job to parent these adults, but it is the university's job to provide a safe place to live. The university should not practice discrimination against students who are smokers any more than it should practice discrimination against overweight students. Perhaps the extra grant/blackmail money the university receives for enacting such bans is not worth risking the lives of students who refuse to go along with the policy.
Michael J. McFadden
Tue Oct 9 2012 08:32
If OSU claims it can implement and enforce a smoking ban on tobacco in its dormitories then it quite clearly has the capability of doing the same for marijuana. - = - = -

That would seem to make it legally responsible for doing so, otherwise it is engaged in enabling behavior similar to a pimp renting out space in a crack den. Not only might it be liable to be shut down under state laws if it continues to overlook marijuana smoking on campus but it would also likely be eminently suable for any accidents/injuries/deaths incurred by students after it permitted them to smoke pot on the campus. Parents should be made aware of this. Similar liability could occur in the event of fires caused by hidden smoking with its concomitant hasty and improper disposal of butts after fire-safety devices (ashtrays) are forbidden. Property damage and injuries incurred by pushing smoking students and staff off onto neighborhood porches on the perimeter of the school could also rack up a bill. Tuition increases anyone? - = - = -

I should note: I'm not a lawyer, I'm just...

Michael J. McFadden,
Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"

Cerisier
Mon Oct 8 2012 19:25
OSU is a public university. Therefore, it is public property. Therefore, a complete smoking ban is unethical and, in my non-lawyer opinion, illegal. Without a state-level ban on smoking on university campuses (which I would also oppose), OSU is way out of line.
Anonymous
Mon Oct 8 2012 15:25
Not a big fan of smoking, but people smoking on campus hasn't affected me one time in my four years here. Are they trying to distract us from something?
Anonymous
Mon Oct 8 2012 14:37
This is another example of trying to push an agenda on people. And not only that, but they've made up their minds ALREADY before the 'forums' to the public even happen. What if there is a huge backlash? They'll do it anyway. They don't want to listen to anybody. This ban includes chewing tobacco, too, which is ridiculous. And on top of that, it sets a precedent that human behavior can be completely banned because some public health nuts think its unsafe. What's next? Not accepting obese students? It sets a terrible precedent. But, like all other decisions, there is no free will- it's going to happen no matter what we do. Thank goodness I'm out of here next year.
Anonymous
Mon Oct 8 2012 10:45
being fat and cops kill more people than smoking
Anonymous
Mon Oct 8 2012 09:09
"Smoking is the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality in the U.S."- False, obesity is.

There at least needs to be designated smoking areas. It's ridiculous to make people walk all the way off campus just to smoke a cig. If a 100% ban goes into effect people will be breaking it like crazy, especially smokers who live in dorms. It will effect the janitors/cleaning staff. I always see them outside in the morning smoking.

Anonymous
Mon Oct 8 2012 03:42
But it's easy to buy cigarettes online and bring them with you. Try www.lowcostcigarettesus.com or similar :)




log out