Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Ohio still against gay marriage, marijuana

duee.1@osu.edu

Published: Tuesday, November 13, 2012

Updated: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 23:11

weed

Courtesy of MCT

A bicyclist rides past Zen Healing, a medical marijuana dispensary on Santa Monica Boulevard in West Hollywood, Calif. on Oct. 7, 2011.

When it comes to same-sex marriage and the legalization of marijuana, some Ohio State students would argue that Ohio’s thinking is still conservative.

On Nov. 6, Maine and Maryland voted to allow same-sex marriages. The two states joined New York, Connecticut, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Washington, Vermont and the District of Columbia in passing the law. All other states, including Ohio, stand behind the Defense of Marriage Act enacted in 1996, which bans gay marriage.

Some OSU students said they were happy to see additional states recognize gay marriage on Election Day.

“I was very happy,” said Garett Heysel, president of Scarlet and Gay. “For me and I think for many people, both gay and straight, it’s more a question of civil rights, the ability to have the same rights that straight people are for, when they are allowed to marry and move from state to state.”

According to the Ohio Constitution, “only a union between one man and one woman may be a marriage valid in or recognized by this state and its political subdivisions.”

It also says “This state and its political subdivisions shall not create or recognize a legal status for relationships of unmarried individuals that intends to approximate the design, qualities, significance or effect of marriage.”

Although Ohio does not recognize gay marriage, it had the seventh highest population of same-sex households within a state in 2011, with 21,432, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. California had the highest number, with 87,078 same-sex households. Of the top seven states, only New York, which was ranked as No. 3 with 44,319, has legislation in place allowing gay marriage.

“I think there are certain parts of the American population that are going to take longer to convince that it’s OK and that society is not gonna go to hell in (a) hand basket because same-sex couples are allowed to marry,” Heysel said.

In 2004 Ohio had an issue on the ballot that proposed constitutionally defining marriage as a union between a man and a woman. The issue passed, and President George W. Bush, who announced his support for a federal constitutional amendment banning gay marriage earlier that year, was re-elected to a second term with the support of Ohio voters.

Despite Ohio’s stronghold against same-sex marriage in the past decade, Garrett Nunn, a third-year in international studies and Spanish, said he thinks the fact that same-sex marriage has been passed in so many states is a “huge step.”

“I think within the next four years it will just continue to be passed (in other states), and the fact that Ohio hasn’t passed it yet isn’t really discouraging to me because I’ve seen it happen in other places,” Nunn said.

According to an article by the Columbus Dispatch, gay marriage supporters are attempting to collect signatures to get “The Freedom to Marry and Religious Freedom Amendment” on the Ohio ballot in November 2013.

The petition being circulated says the amendment will: “Allow two consenting adults freedom to enter into a marriage regardless of gender. Give religious institutions freedom to determine whom to marry. Give religious institutions protection to refuse to perform a marriage,” according to the Columbus Dispatch.
Heysel said a lot of the organizations that helped those amendments pass in the different states are mobilizing right now, targeting the other states.

The legalization of gay marriage wasn’t the only controversial issue that passed on Nov. 6.

Colorado and Washington passed measures legalizing the use of marijuana for recreational use for anyone 21 years old and older. Federal law, however, still says marijuana is an illegal drug.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation showed that in 2011, the highest number of arrests in the United States were drug abuse violations (estimated at more than 1.5 million arrests), which is almost as much as the population of Idaho. Of these arrests, 49.5 percent were made because of marijuana, which is almost 10 times more than other synthetic or manufactured drug arrests. In Ohio, the possession of more than 200 grams of marijuana is a felony and can be punished with prison time.

Jake Evans, a first-year in business, said he would welcome the idea of legalizing the plant in Ohio. He thinks it will have a positive effect on the economy and the crime rate.

“I think it would help the drug problem and obviously cut back on taxpayer money as far as jailing people goes because there will be a lot less crimes compared to drugs being sold and people being put in jail for drugs,” Evans said.

Dawn Bartley, a fourth-year in social work, believes that marijuana is less harmful than some other painkillers, and she wishes there was more consistency with regulations on marijuana from state to state.

“I think you are either a person who is going to (use marijuana) or you are a person who is not going to do that. And I don’t think it being legal is going to make somebody more abets to do it,” Bartley said.

Some OSU students said the changing state regulations are a step in the right direction.

“It shows how the country is progressing,” Nunn said, “and I’m sure it’ll continue to happen.”

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

13 comments

Anonymous
Tue Nov 27 2012 10:52
Marriage is not a Christian Term. Marriage takes place in all societies. It can be sanctioned religiously or not. Marriage can have nothing to do with Christianity. It is about equal protection under the law. We don't want to shove anything in anyone's face. We just want equal rights. And U.S. Law cannot define and defend something as being specifically "Christian". What about married Jews? Married Muslims? Married Mormons (who in my opinion are not Christian)? Marriage is about equality. And eventually the U.S. Supreme Court must and will determine that the Federal DOMA is unconstitutional. One by one the states will follow. It will happen.
Gary
Fri Nov 16 2012 11:42
You have to know the history of the nation and what the term marriage means as written in United States law and the law of the states. It means "one man and one woman", these writers never considered that same sex couples would want to qualify under it,, nor did they even fathom the whole "idea" of same-sex couples. The term marriage was the Christian definition. Therefore, in order for same sex couples to be married, the law must be changed.

Since we are going to go ahead and revise the law - while opening this revision, do NOT use the term marriage, because in every state, as well as federally, the definition at the time it was written was "man and woman" as in Christian marriage. It's intention and spirit was of Christian definition. We don't want religion in our constitutions, whether state or federal. You have to know the "spirit of the law" as it was written.

Let's change the name as recognized by the government to "union". Same sex and opposite sex UNIONS will have equal rights under whichever state so chooses to implement this. You can call yourself married if you want. By me saying "married" it means that my wife and I were joined in a bond for life under God. You saying you are "married" may mean that you are just committed to each other for life. But it NOT a governmental recognized term.

Truthfully, people really only want equal rights under the law, and that's what this will give. They only want equal rights, correct?

OR do they actually want to undermine the Christian majority, with an anti-Christian motive? I believe that this spirit DOES exist to a great degree. These people have EXTREME hate in their hearts for Christians. The spirit that they want is to "shove it in the face" of Christians by perverting the Christian term of "marriage". This "vengeful" spirit of religious-bigotry is not the spirit we want in our state. Bigots on any side of the fence are detrimental to society, but it seems that we allow minorities to be bigots.

Anonymous
Fri Nov 16 2012 03:47
Gary you have this completely backwards. I was married to my same sex spouse legally four years ago. No gods were invited. The very concept would have offended me. In France marriage is up to the government and religious weddings are a waste of time that is not legally recognized. We made a mistake in the USA to allow clergy to marry couples legally. It should have never happened. You are entitled to a religious ceremony, but the state should not recognize it. By the way, my father's an Evangelical minister in Ohio. I wisely left the state decades ago.
Anonymous
Thu Nov 15 2012 20:43
LBGTsupporter. Can people marry two women or two men if they want. What about marry brother or sister? Where is the limit?
Manda Chuva
Thu Nov 15 2012 20:40
So called gay marriage is not real. I see a lot of child abuse by these so called couples who adopt children for the appearance that they constitute a family. This is ridiculous.
Manda Chuva
Thu Nov 15 2012 20:34
When this article says "still conservative", I think it gives the message that they expect that one day gay so-called marriage should be approved. When this happens, there will be a massive invasion of gay illegal immigrants coming here to obtain the green card by marriage. Bad choice. Stay away. Ohio does not deserve this.
LBGTsupporter
Thu Nov 15 2012 17:22
i just think Ohio should just accept and deal with the modern era we're in, and that there is a bigger LBGT community and that people should be able to marry who they want... its suppose to be a free country people!
Gary
Thu Nov 15 2012 13:57
We will all be accountable to explain our transgressions when the day comes. But as far as we know, as long as we have accepted Christ as our Savior, all of our sins, past and future are forgiven. This includes homosexuals and homosexual activity of those who have accepted Christ. The church simply does not want to enable/condone what is clearly defined in the Bible as sin.
Gary
Thu Nov 15 2012 13:52
It is not Christian to spew hate at another human being. You must love them and look out for them. Pray for them and things that afflict them. You're not even taught to stay away from these people. They are forgiven in God's eyes through Christ, even for their future transgressions.

No Christian churches perform same-sex marriages. They may call themselves Christians, but performing marriages for same-sex couples is inherently non-Biblical and therefore, not Christian. For example, Jeremiah Wright calls his teachings "Christian", when in reality they clearly are not. (as you've heard his sound-bytes over the past 6 years, etc.)T here are a lot of harsh realities in the Bible that people live with everyday: afflictions....some of which they were simply born with and some that are cause of their surroundings. We can't explain why God has made us so that we have to deal with these afflictions, but He has and we have to trust his Word.

These Churches try to say that the Law in Leviticus no longer applies. It IS true that Christ did strike down old laws that applied to food, for example, but never mentioned homosexuality. We only have the words of his apostles after Christ's death. Paul is VERY clear about homosexuality. There have been attempts of people to try to justify what Paul "really" was saying, but these attempts at stretching the Truth are simply perversions of the Word. There are many immoral acts that aren't mentioned in the Bible, but are surely considered abominations.

Christian
Wed Nov 14 2012 13:21
Gary,

Your ignorance is astounding. Marriage is a civil contract in America, not a religious monopoly. Furthermore, thousands of churchs of different denominatins perform same-sex marriages every year. If you want your Church to perform the ceremony, that is your option--AND the church's option.

Anonymous
Wed Nov 14 2012 09:36
This headline was dramatically misleading. Nothing in the article indicates that Ohioans are still opposed to either gay marriage or marijuana.

Unless your headline was simply supposed to tell us the law, thereby making the article really insignificant, you should have changed the article to reflect the nation's changing preference, and a seemingly large level of support among OSU students.

Gary
Wed Nov 14 2012 09:27
Solution:

The government should not have any hand in "MARRIAGE". Marriage is a joining of man and woman under religious practice.

The government should have no hand in religious practices, therefore, "Marriage" should not be in their vocabulary.

The government should only recognize marriage of a man and woman as a "union". They should only recognize the union of same sex couples as a "union". These unions should have equal rights under government law.

Simple as that.

edgington.29@osu.edu
Wed Nov 14 2012 06:17
As for Ohio's disdain for so called gay marriage (the term is marriage, period) I think it's ludicrous that in 2012 Americans vote for or against other people's basic rights. This should never be a referendum item. Civil marriage equality is coming, and those who oppose it are on the wrong side of history. The writer refers to "same-sex households" as a statistical base of comparison, but I would remind everyone that these are real people, real families who want nothing more nor less than the rights and benefits that straight people take for granted every day.
As for marijuana and the recent reefer-rendums, as far as I can tell the only danger with weed is that it might lead to smoking cigarettes. Let's stop ruining people's lives for nothing, and stop draining tax-payer coffers in the process.




log out