Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

OSU professor told: 'We'll see who gets their ass handed to them'

edgington.29@osu.edu

Published: Wednesday, April 14, 2010

Updated: Saturday, June 16, 2012 00:06

Download PDF


Ohio State professor Loren E. Babcock has conducted geologic research in Antarctica, China and various other countries.

Supervisors have ranked Babcock in the "top quartile" of the geological sciences faculty. He has authored dozens of scholarly articles and books, including an acclaimed textbook.

Babcock's work "reflects your national and international prominence in the field," department chair Frank Schwartz wrote in September 2005.

But on Jan. 3, 2008, the tectonic plates shifted, and Babcock's career began to crumble. During an argument in his office, former research assistant Lara Ford threatened to tell Babcock's boss about their on-again-off-again romantic relationship and said, "We'll see who gets their ass handed to them."

Ford was in his class in 2004. Babcock gave her a gift — a trilobite, a fossil familiar to those in their shared field. In the next few years, the relationship evolved. It eventually ended with competing sexual harassment complaints with OSU's Human Resources office, and finally a lawsuit.

In January, Babcock sued OSU, contending that the university mishandled an investigation into his complaints and leaked defamatory information about him that ruined his career.

In February court filings, the university contended that some of what Babcock alleges is false and that the university simply can't be held responsible for other claims. OSU told the judge the case should be dismissed.

In 2004, Ford became a research assistant for Babcock on a project at the Byrd Polar Research Center. During that time, they began to share details about their personal lives.

In September 2004, Ford's job ended, and their relationship became social. For example, although he was married at the time, they traveled together to Cincinnati for a Christmas party.

In January 2005, they attended a conference in New Orleans, where Babcock was a presenter. The evening before the conference started, they had dinner, drinks and went to jazz clubs.

Afterward, according to statements both gave to university investigators in 2008, Ford wanted Babcock to see to it that she return safely to her hotel room.

In her statement, Ford said they had consensual sex.

"We had sex that night, and I stayed in his room the rest of the weekend."

In his statement, Babcock said he wasn't sure they had sex.

"I returned to my room alone, washed my face, and took an Ambien to settle my nerves after the unnerving experience in [Ford's] room," he said.

Babcock said Ford then came to his room, and he told her to leave.

Then, because of jet lag from his recent London trip and the effect of the Ambien, "I started to feel dizzy, and that's the last thing I remember. I had blacked out," he said. "I woke up in the early morning [Monday, January 24, 2005] with my clothes on."

Babcock said that in the morning, Ford appeared at his room and claimed they had sex the night before.

"If that is true, and I'm not sure it is, I have no memory of it," Babcock said in his statement. "Certainly I was in no condition to have given consent."

Babcock said he sensed on the flight home that Ford had forced herself on him and began harassing him afterward. She demanded a sexual relationship and threatened to derail his career.

From that point, the stories began to diverge, and the relationship became more and more unstable until the he-said, she-said verbal exchange encrusted the truth like sediment on a fossil.

He said, I drove her to her car and pecked her cheek.

She said, he kissed me on the lips and cried about his family problems.

He said, I never asked her for sex, she's lying.

She said, he was often late for class because he wanted sex beforehand.

He said, the red robe from China was a common gift.

She said, it was a sexy negligee in red, his favorite color.

He said, not true — blue is my favorite color.

And on and on.

About the events in New Orleans, Ford said she was devastated at losing her virginity and for the damage she had done to Babcock's family.

"I was so psychologically disturbed by what I had done to his wife and his child that I told him we shouldn't see each other again," she said in her statement.

Babcock said otherwise. "She had been chasing me mercilessly for months, never taking ‘no' for an answer," he said.

In another he-said, she-said volley, Babcock and Ford gave wildly different accounts of the same conversation.

Prior to visiting her family, Babcock heard Ford say, "Don't be surprised if I don't kill you."

Her version is that she said in a humorous way, "My family might kill you," because they didn't approve of the relationship.

According to Babcock's statement, in July 2007, Ford went to his office in Mendenhall Lab and physically assaulted him, then said, "I'll go to Schwartz."

Babcock countered, "I'll file a sexual harassment complaint with OSU."

Despite the troubled relationship, they saw each other socially many times. Babcock gave Ford gifts from his travel overseas, including a bottle of Chardonnay from Australia, six wine glasses to go with it, a Diana Krall CD and the infamous piece of red clothing.

Babcock's divorce, angry e-mails, phone messages and assorted events disputed by both parties further eroded the relationship.

After the 2008 confrontation in his office, Babcock formally complained to the Office of Human Resources on Jan. 17. In his statement, Babcock mentioned Ford's depressed state and erratic behavior.

"I've never seen a human being so out of control," he said.

A second Human Resource meeting occurred on March 11. Human Resources advised Babcock to file a complaint with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission, a standard procedure in such cases. That complaint, filed July 1, was dismissed for lack of evidence.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

43 comments

Anonymous
Mon May 3 2010 11:01
Academics are getting a black eye for behavior not only beneath the dignity of a professor, but beyond the pale. Academics must support their union be it the AAUP or similar. They must codify rules and standards of conduct. Among those should be prohibition to engage in sexual liaisons with students or others under said professor's supervision. Failure to abide by those rules should result in sanctions.
Anonymous
Thu Apr 29 2010 04:54
This is classic teacher/student stuff that gets high school teachers in serious hot water. Why would OSU want to tolerate this in a major institution in a one horse town like Columbus where OSU matters. If this prof "skates" like Bill Clinton did, it tells me large public institutions are far more inept then their large private industry counterparts, where something like this would have been over months ago.
Anonymous
Wed Apr 28 2010 12:06
He said, not true — blue is my favorite color. LMAO great quote...

this story sucks though, badly written and i hate when the media gets involved with this petty, personal stuff. peoples lives are ruined by it. isn't there REAL news to report on?

Anonymous
Wed Apr 28 2010 09:38
Not having any prior knowledge of the situation, I do not understand why this is an important story; however it does sound as if OSU may have mishandled some of it. In addition, I have seen better and worse writing. One does not have to be an English major to be a student journalist.
Anonymous
Mon Apr 26 2010 23:52
"All right, let's see an example from you of better journalism. I also don't see your logic. Not everyone in their field is always going to be producing A+ material. I'm sure you haven't in whatever field you're in/going into."

Um, as a former Lantern writer myself, I will gladly share with you some articles I've written that I think are substantially better written than this one.

I think that this could have been a really interesting story. It's just so poorly organized and confusing that I finished reading it wondering why I had wasted my time...

Yeah, not everyone is always producing "A+" material in their field. But they better be getting a passing grade...

I said in an earlier comment that you really can't blame the writer. This could be the first article he's ever written for all we know. This is a STUDENT newspaper and a lot of people are just getting their feet wet. But editors are the ones who should be setting the example for the new writers, and setting standards for what goes into the paper. This one should have been handed back to the writer, and he should have been given some guidance on how to pare it down to the necessary information and put it in a logical order. The editors are the ones who are paid to make sure what gets into the Lantern is readable.

Anonymous
Fri Apr 23 2010 02:58
Loren, isn't your own daughter about the same age now that Ms Ford was when this happened? I wonder how you would like a jerk manipulating and taking advantage of his position with your daughter as you did with Ms Ford?
Anonymous
Wed Apr 21 2010 15:46
To the anonymous person who posted on 4/20: You must be Loren! Fighting for your good name? You don't have one. Wake up! You took advantage of a student! And to play off the student as if she lived in a fantasy world and is nuts? Puh-leeze! Take a look around, seems like most of these comments (other than the ones about the lack of talent the writer has) are in favor of the student. You have no good name, Loren. You are pathetic.
Anonymous
Tue Apr 20 2010 05:13
this story did not add up together. just read carefully ford's statement: it is written by a person who is not consistent in what she thinks and feels. some of her allegations, like having sex in public places, sound as if they are fantasies of a mentally unstable person. lara ford must have been obsessed with that man. it clearly looks like the uni is campaigning against a person who is courageous enough to fight for his good name.
Anonymous
Sun Apr 18 2010 19:22
Loren, don't you think it is time to grow up at age 48 and stop expecting the world to feel sorry for you? You are a lothsome cheater who had more that one affair going on at the same time. Quit picking on one of your youngest victims! By the way, is that German prof still willing to be seen with you? I doubt it.
Anonymous
Fri Apr 16 2010 11:46
"All right, let's see an example from you of better journalism. I also don't see your logic. Not everyone in their field is always going to be producing A+ material. I'm sure you haven't in whatever field you're in/going into."

I love how you continue to make assumptions about people. Some Lantern articles are great, and I usually give those people compliments. Others suck. No one is expecting A+ material, but it would be nice to see that everything was at least above a middle school level. Clearly you are an illogical person, so I hope I dumbed that down enough for you. Actually, I see why you are defending the article, it's more your speed.

Anonymous
Fri Apr 16 2010 03:03
I don't consider something that has turned into a lawsuit gossip. Obviously other people have had problems with the guy too...The Lantern did pull the quotes/accusations (even if they are jumbled up in the story) from legitimate documents.
Anonymous
Fri Apr 16 2010 00:23
TheLantern loves gossip.
Anonymous
Thu Apr 15 2010 23:15
I worked for him, too, at the same time as Ms. Ford. He was insane--he wept on my shoulder every day for almost a year until I could find another job. My statement's on file--they might have used that rather than trying to paint a predator as a victim, and vice versa.
Anonymous
Thu Apr 15 2010 23:09
This guy is a terrible person--you can tell from his statement that it's all a lie. Her's is well thought out, and his is just ranting about being pressured for sex. Sure. I bet she did. And kudos to the Anon.--his poor, poor daughter, who is stuck with this guy for life.
Anonymous
Thu Apr 15 2010 22:33
The graphic that originally accompanied the article online is now my desktop background. Best thing I have seen all week! ahahahahahaha. What the hell, did they make that thing in word? Every time I think about that hot mess, I can't stop laughing.
Anonymous
Thu Apr 15 2010 22:32
really classy Loren - your daughter must be so proud..
Thom - Class of 2009
Thu Apr 15 2010 22:03
It is sad when people don't recognize this story as newsworthy. This is a lawsuit with the university over something so strange and different than something you hear every day. All of you people who just dog on The Lantern because it is a student newspaper needs to think a little bit more before they comment. The Lantern isn't a PR publication to that tries to show the university in a good light, it is their duty to report on news just like this.
Anonymous
Thu Apr 15 2010 21:31
How is it possible that this guy still has a job?
Anonymous
Thu Apr 15 2010 19:45
"How do you know any of us to say that we couldn't do a better job? Maybe since journalism is his major, and the fact that this was on the front page, means that it should be clearly organized."

All right, let's see an example from you of better journalism. I also don't see your logic. Not everyone in their field is always going to be producing A+ material. I'm sure you haven't in whatever field you're in/going into.

Go Bucks - Class of '99
Thu Apr 15 2010 17:39
Is this real journalism? How do you start an article about something this serious with all of the positive comments about one party in a sexual harassment lawsuit? And including "And on and on." as part of a story...are you serious? Even for a student newspaper, this is embarrassing. Do you have editors?




log out