Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Photographer: 'I'm on my own'

sullivan.423@osu.edu

Published: Monday, May 3, 2010

Updated: Saturday, June 16, 2012 01:06

Alex Kotran

Alex Kotran

A Lantern photographer who shot photographs of cows that escaped on campus two weeks ago now faces possible charges of criminal trespassing and, despite his requests, will likely not receive legal assistance from Ohio State or The Lantern.

OSU Police sent an e-mail to photographer Alex Kotran on Saturday asking him to schedule a time today or Wednesday when he can be questioned.

Kotran asked if either the university or The Lantern would provide him with an attorney and has yet to hire one himself. He is still not sure whether he will receive assistance from the university.

"I haven't been given a clear answer," Kotran said Monday. "I'm assuming that I'm on my own right now."

In an e-mail to Officer William Linton on Monday, Kotran said "I am currently in the process of obtaining a criminal defense attorney, and will instruct him to contact you once I do."

Linton is the officer who detained and handcuffed Kotran on April 21.

Lantern General Manager John Milliken said representatives of OSU Legal Affairs told him the university cannot provide Kotran with an attorney or the money for an attorney because it is a conflict of interest.

"We have had conversations related to the entire issue. It is fairly filled with conflicts and little nuances that make it very unique," Milliken said. He said what makes this issue unique is that all parties involved are affiliated with the university.

OSU's Legal Affairs Office generally does not respond to calls from Lantern reporters and refers all questions about its operations to Jim Lynch, director of Media Relations.

"The university generally cannot provide legal representation in criminal matters, even to employees," Lynch said Monday.

Tom O'Hara, The Lantern's adviser, sees things a different way.

"I find it odd that the university has the resources to pursue prosecution of a student who hasn't done anything wrong, but it doesn't have the resources to help defend a student who hasn't done anything wrong," O'Hara said.

Milliken said the case would be different if the issue involved a student facing criminal charges or being threatened with suit by a party outside the university. Still, The Lantern has no money budgeted for legal services for student staff members.

Some student media organizations do provide students with legal counsel when needed. For example, Louisiana State University has money in its budget for such cases, said Jim Shelledy, director of Student Media at LSU.

"We set aside $10,000 every year for legal contingencies that would be a little out of the ordinary," Shelledy said. "The university covers us for libel cases." He said that money comes from ad revenue and student fees.

Shelledy said the money could be used to hire an attorney to defend a student against criminal charges, but usually it does not reach the point where an attorney is needed.

Frank LoMonte, executive director of the Student Press Law Center, said cases in which university police press charges against student journalists are rare. He said it happens "maybe once a year."

He also said it is fairly uncommon for a university to provide a student journalist with criminal defense counsel.

"My strong prediction would be that someone higher up in the university will recognize that this was a terrible mistake by the police and work to make it right," LoMonte said.

Len Downie, former editor for The Washington Post, said he finds the actions of the various university employees involved in Kotran's detainment and the university's unwillingness to provide Kotran with legal representation outrageous.

"It is deeply disturbing to me as an alumnus of the School of Journalism," said Downie, who served as The Lantern's managing editor in the early 1960s.

The Lantern's Publications Committee rejected a proposed resolution Thursday to have the School of Communication provide legal representation to student staff members when needed. But the committee agreed to seek information from the university on its policy of legal representation for Lantern staff.

Downie, who now serves as the Weil Family Professor of Journalism at Arizona State University, said this is unacceptable.

"I can understand the budget issues involved. But budget issues aside, in every other way, the school should be fully supportive of the student journalist," Downie said.

Felecia Ross, chair of the committee, said the committee rejected the motion because of the way it was phrased, not because they did not support Kotran.

"We just did not want to make a decision before we have all the information," Ross said.

Kotran and his family are in the process of finding an attorney.

Kotran's father, Nick Kotran, called the incident "a shame" and said he believes "it should never have happened." But he was reluctant to say whether his family or the university should be responsible for hiring an attorney for Alex.

"I am not worried about who is going to pay for it," Nick Kotran said.
"I am going to do whatever it takes to get this settled. We are
working to get this dropped and then we'll worry about money."

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

47 comments

Anonymous
Tue Jan 8 2013 00:19
Someone at the Lantern should contact the Student Press Legal Center (SPLC dot Org). It a a free legal center that will assist with student media issues.
Anonymous
Mon May 10 2010 12:23
To the last anonymous poster: I find it extremely difficult to believe that you haven't seen the four additional Lantern articles on this topic. It's essentially all the Lantern's been publishing for the past week and a half.
Anonymous
Mon May 10 2010 10:15
Sorry, but some things are missing from the article. What did he do (other than take pictures of a cow)? Was he arrested? What is he charged with? Do his actions justify the charges? Why does he need an attorney? What do the cops have to say for themselves? This article comes across as a veiled opinion piece expressing righteous indignation at the university. Maybe that's justified (on the editorial page). But your readers need more information to decide for themselves.
Anonymous
Sat May 8 2010 21:58
Ohio State pretend-cops can't catch a couple of poor ol' cows without shooting and/or shooting at them? And some Ohio State cop impersonator claims Kotran was too close and/or in danger from said rabid, crazed, killer cows? Um, these weren't bulls, were they? So where was the danger? And where is the Ohio State pretend-JSchool's ethics if it won't defend this young photographer for trying to get photos for its newspaper? I must bookmark this entire episode so I can laugh at the ineptness displayed by all parties involved -- except for Kotran. Being a 60-something photographer who has stood in front of speeding horses and walking through range fires to get the perfect shot, I must express my admiration for this young photographer. Dangerous cows indeed!
Anonymous
Sat May 8 2010 08:10
Kinda funny how this story was never picked up by the local or national press. Why not? Perhaps because the version printed by the paper here was totally factually inaccurate? Was this just the staff there trying to get their guy out of trouble? Maybe the REAL press actually read the report. The lantern also couldn't find but a few "ex" types to speak on this one. Same reason?
Anonymous
Fri May 7 2010 14:57
Why is OSU letting these idiot cops run amuck?

"OSU Police sent an e-mail to photographer Alex Kotran on Saturday asking him to schedule a time today or Wednesday when he can be questioned."

The hell with that. NEVER TALK TO THE POLICE. What, the goons can't find anything to charge him with, so now they want to try and intimidate him?

W.J. Klosterman - Photo Editor of The Lantern 1975
Thu May 6 2010 13:33
Paul Williams would be turning in his grave if he saw this. Of course, knowing that our beloved J-School is now part of the Department of Communications (indeed!) would have killed him anyway.
Anonymous
Thu May 6 2010 10:03
Mr Kotran should reach out to the alumni for help, especially those that donate millions to the University yearly. The Alumni Association could create a fund and solicit donations for his defense. There are many of us closely watching this case and OSUs behavior.
Anonymous
Wed May 5 2010 16:05
Little wonder why the state of journalism and photojournalism in this country is at such a low point.
Unbelievable.
At one time the mid-west was known as a place where level-headed people who had some perspective on the world lived. I guess now mid-westerners are just jerks like the rest of us.
Legs of Thunder
Wed May 5 2010 09:12
It's about time a journalist wrote a truly hard hitting article instead of the normal garbage like "OSU Grad Knows Her Cows." Half the articles I read on here sound like the reporters were drunk on the job and looking for anything to write down so they can get back to the bar ASAP. This article has restored my faith in The Lantern and I will now begin reading it again, along with UWeekly...a true combination of wit, insight, integrity and grammar.
Anonymous
Tue May 4 2010 23:08
I think it would be extremely ridiculous to waste any of the students, lantern, or university's money providing Kotran with a Lawyer. Since both sides are directly affiliated with the university then they should come together for a resolution and not take this issue to court. The fact that he is facing legal repercussions for doing his job ON PUBLIC PROPERTY is beyond me. It seems to me that the OSU police wanted him to cease documenting their failed attempt to handle the situation. They made a poor choice and now they are too stubborn to admit they were wrong. I just don't want to pay for their mistake.
Anonymous
Tue May 4 2010 21:32
I'm retired from teaching photojournalism at OSU. One of my classes was Lantern photography. I'm saddened that The Ohio State University sends student journalists in harms way and the refuses to defend them legally. Kotran is an undergraduate student doing his homework. Kotran was practicing aggressive journalism. I'm not defending law breaking, but if journalists turned away every time it was suggested or ordered, the public would not learn much. Two university entities are in conflict. I't's a conflict of interest in a profound way if the University supports one of its interest and refuses to defend the other?
OH Newsphotographer
Tue May 4 2010 16:52
As a news photographer myself, OSU has lost my respect. I have lived in Ohio for the past 21 years, I have never really liked the university because stuff like this keeps happening over and over.

If nothing else, Kotran IS an employee (paid or not paid) of the university and even though it might be a "conflict of interest," OSU should have to PAY for his legal defense since he was doing his job as an employee of OSU.

Also, Kotran is not majoring in photojournalism and yet is on their staff. When I was in school, one could not work at the paper unless you were at least a sophomore or an upper classman.

The point with the above paragraph is that he has not enough experience in dealing with these types of situations. BUT, this does NOT excuse OSU’s actions, nor does it imply that Kotran was in the wrong or doing something illegal.

Lastly, the story states that the police fired “shots” at the cows; doesn’t that alone warrant an investigation with all the people around there? If one let the cows alone for a while, the cows would have settled down. Why are there no charges being brought against the people who let the cows get loose?

— 30 —

Anonymous
Tue May 4 2010 16:18
I'm retired from teaching photojournalism at OSU. One of my classes was Lantern photography. I'm saddened that The Ohio State University sends student journalists in harms way and the refuses to defend them legally. Kotran is an undergraduate student doing his homework. Kotran was practicing aggressive journalism. I'm not defending law breaking, but if journalists turned away every time it was suggested or ordered, the public would not learn much. Two university entities are in conflict. I't's a conflict of interest in a profound way if the University supports one of its interest and refuses to defend the other?
Anonymous
Tue May 4 2010 14:26
The issue isn't legal defense for the student journalist - the issue is that the university should get control of it's police department.
A former editor
Tue May 4 2010 14:25
This is a great example of short-term thinking. Gee has been an advocate for years of having publisher's discretion over the Lantern, which the school and paper have successfully avoided by leaving the Lantern as a separate, self-sustaining paper. If the university starts taking responsibility for the actions of student journalists, how soon will they want editorial control? Be very careful what you wish for kid. You don't work for the university, you work for the paper.
Anonymous
Tue May 4 2010 14:22
Ohio State ought to stop pretending it has a journalism school. The university began dismantling the j-school 20 years ago (not long after I graduated from there) and subsequently lost accreditation. Pitiful. Ohio State will not receive another penny from me.
Anonymous
Tue May 4 2010 13:58
We are still talking about this ginger kid? Maybe the cows got enraged by his red hair? Ole!
Anonymous
Tue May 4 2010 13:33
This is absurd. By not giving him legal help, OSU and The Lantern are condoning the ridiculous and unconstitutional actions of the local cops.
Anonymous
Tue May 4 2010 13:32
the question below me is so idiotic that there's pretty much no comment for it except this: please tell me you are not a student or an alumni of ohio state university because that's just embarrassing.




log out