Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Protesters chant in front of Statehouse, challenge Senate Bill 5

tussel.2@osu.edu

Published: Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Updated: Saturday, June 16, 2012 00:06

Protest SB5

Mitch Andrews / Lantern Photographer

Protesters in oppositon of State Bill 5 flood the 3rd street entrance of the Ohio State House in downtown Columbus, Ohio, early in the afternoon of Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2011.

A dense crowd formed around the east and south sides of the Ohio Statehouse Tuesday afternoon to protest a bill that would eliminate collective bargaining for state workers.

As of 1:40 p.m., the doors remained locked and protesters stood outside chanting, "Let us in."

"We are willing to stand out here to talk," said Steve Nash, a firefighter from Solon, Ohio, standing in 27-degree weather and light snow. "And if (Gov. John Kasich) is not willing to come out, then that proves why we need collective bargaining."

Nash, 46, traveled with others about 160 miles from Northeast Ohio on Tuesday to protest Senate Bill 5.

Garry Nemeth, another Solon firefighter representing Local 2079, said they were here to protest what they say is "an assault on unions, an assault on collective bargaining and an assault on the middle class."

Another protester, Bernard Ravasio of Steubenville in eastern Ohio, traveled two and a half hours to "stand up for middle class families and workers."

"They wouldn't want to stop at public sector employees," said the 61-year-old member of United Steel Workers. "They would want to go into the private sector later."

Senate Bill 5 would eliminate the collective-bargaining abilities of state workers and replace them with a merit-based system. Negotiating power of police officers, firefighters and teachers would be restricted. Police and firefighters still would not be able to strike. Teachers could still go on strike — but schools would be able to hire permanent replacements.

Republicans tout the bill as an effective way to create jobs and "set the table for economic growth."

"We have to give local government officials a way to be more efficient and more effective in the delivery of services," Ohio Gov. John Kasich said Monday night in an interview with Fox News' Bill Hemmer, "and we have to give them the flexibility they need to manage their costs, including labor."

Democrats, on the other hand, call the bill a direct attack on the middle class, saying it will be a detriment to public servants.

"Senate Bill 5 … would strip away collective bargaining rights, hurt the middle class, kill jobs and destroy communities," former Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland wrote in a blog post Saturday on the Ohio Democratic Party website. "This fight … (is) about whether or not we will be a state that stands up for the middle class." 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

20 comments

Anonymous
Fri Feb 25 2011 22:39
We appreciate your coverage. Do understand that this is not an exclusive State Workers or Union issue. This is about PUBLIC EMPLOYEES which in an of itself is a real DESIGNATION that should not have servitude connotations attached to it. Public Employees are State, City, County, and any Local Government or functional extension thereof, School Teachers (all) , State University Teachers workers, and of course also Retiree's. We are quality individuals and the career employees keep this horribly administered government functioning. We are not demagogues, but citizens as is with you, who care and have families, careers and individual goals and abilities. The fact that we require legislation to legitimize and authorize what we do is DESPICABLE. We all know economics is a fractial portion so minuscule so as to not be a concerning factor in this legislation. True money savings could be acheived with a little honesty from management regarding ratios and outsourced cost and a quid pro quo with the working employees on how to fix the system.
Anonymous
Thu Feb 24 2011 09:15
"boo hoo. might want to save your time complaining and look for another job (one that pays market wage, not an artificially inflated one). sincerely, a taxpayer"
Which is exactly why the best of the public sector workers will LEAVE this state. All you will have left are people who will do, or say anything to get the job, and people who can't leave. Then, you will have more quotas for tickets, more discrimination, more public workers who don't care, more of them on the take, less quality, less equality...and all under the guise of "merit pay," and "flexibility to manage," which are buzz words that many of you out there have bit onto hook, line and sinker.
Bill Bowman
Thu Feb 24 2011 05:36
How's that ���hope and change��� crap working for you obamabats? Had you all hoodwink well you should have voted for Mrs. Bill Clinton but we know progressives get suckered in on looks and bumper sticker slogans
Anonymous
Wed Feb 23 2011 15:57
So, I'm guessing that all non-union jobs are minimum wage? Lawyers, doctors, nurses, accountants, IT, etc. Let's be real, this is about leveling the playing field for everyone, and you and I, the tax payers not overpaying. There's only so many dollars to go around, either costs need to be reduced, programs cut (and jobs lost), or taxes raised to cover the 8 billion dollar gap. I don't see anyone holding signs at the State House saying "Raise Our Taxes".
Anonymous
Wed Feb 23 2011 13:26
Gee, a system where employees would be gaged on their work, not on their contract? Um, not a bad thing. By the way, the whole "they'll eventually work for minimum wage" is a load of crap, because ultimately, you have to pay what someone will work for. Time for a change alright - and not Obama's change
Power to the people right now
Wed Feb 23 2011 11:56
Are the people on responding to this story INSANE. If you get rid of collective bargaining you are not going to have teachers, firefighters or policeman do you think these people want to do these jobs for minimum wage because that is what will happen if Kasich gets his way. Yea there might be more jobs but people will be living below poverty level and I don't think that people want to have a police officer when they need them to not give a darn because they can't put food on their own families table, so why should they worry if stuff out of your house is stolen or you have to pay before a firefighter will help you put out your burning house. I for one do not want my children to be taught by people who will eventually say "you don't have to do that much or go to college because it doesn't pay" be a slacker. And those of you who don't think that will happen are highly delusional!
Power to the people
Anonymous
Tue Feb 22 2011 21:31
Thought this whole issue was about getting the state out of debt. Everyone agrees that cuts need to be made, but it is easier with someone else's cause. The hard truth is that it will affect each one of us in some way.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 22 2011 19:33
This has nothing to do with Labor Unions in general, but has everything to do with the public employee unions. FDR said it best, labor unions have no place in government.
Diaz-Sprague
Tue Feb 22 2011 17:49
Labor unions serve as a countervailing power to the power of capital. Unions negotiate not only for pay and benefits but also for working conditions. It's because of unions that we have working conditions that the nonunion world often takes for granted. Things such as minimum wage, paid vacation, paid sick leave, 8-hour day and 40-hour week as opposed to "sunup to sundown" or "as long as it takes" rules. Really folks, if you read about the unions' history of social progress in this country, you'll realize that despite their flaws they ought to be preserved.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 22 2011 16:47
The times they are a'changin'. Public employee unions embody a conflict of interests, Tax dollars are paid as wages and partially diverted to unions, which then use those monies to buy political clout. That political clout then helps raise the public employee's wages and benefits. As Milo Minderbinder said, "Everyone wins." Well, everyone except the taxpayer.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 22 2011 16:41
Really, lumping teachers in with fire fighters and police. There's a glut of teachers, and because of the unions, performance has little or anything to do with employment. If there's such a concern about public servants, what about the military? No union there, maybe they need one as well.
johnwburke001
Tue Feb 22 2011 16:35
Back in 1958 I read a book on Communism and BrainWashing tacts. They stated in that book that"We, (the Communist Party) were not worried about BrainWashing the Adults, They were going to infiltrate our Education system, start indoctrination of the KinderGarten, Elementary children and work their way up to
the Colleges. HOW TRUE THAT IS TODAY. JUST LOOK AT WHAT THE PROFESSORS AND TEACHERS ARE TEACHING IN OUR SCHOOL SYSTEMS! When I met William Hearst in California in 1966 He told our group that the Press would and could create Public Opinions.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 22 2011 16:27
Public employees need unions more than anyone! They are public servants, and should be paid for doing a job that many people wouldn't touch. Would you be a fire fighter, police officer, or public school teacher? Probably not. But the Republicans and salty taxpayers everywhere think that they can step all over these people and treat them like dirt because we pay their paycheck. And that's not fair. They deserve to be able to make a living wage in exchange for being in a career that has little growth and lots of danger, and if Republicans and taxpayers can't look out for them, they need a union to. I'm not in a union, but I don't feel like my employer would ever treat me so unfairly in my employment situation so I don't need one!
Anonymous
Tue Feb 22 2011 16:10
Our forefathers may have needed labor unions as the labor laws and fair and equitable treatment of employees did not exist. Should everyone receive a 4% cost of living increase even though the cost of living is not increasing at that rate. Do you think the union would have put up with increasing their contribution to insurance more than non-union employees? The other option is to raise everyone's taxes.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 22 2011 15:56
"United STEAL Workers"? What is it a union of bank robbers? Geesus Lantern...
Anonymous
Tue Feb 22 2011 15:55
President Obama your in cleveland today and the people need you in Columbus to get the state house open lest do something please!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Anonymous
Tue Feb 22 2011 15:41
Its about unions who pay contributions to hire those who will give them hire wages. What other workforce does that, no one. Only democrats let it happen because they want that entitlement mentality in the community. Unions are outdated and now serve nothing more than securing political office and increasing the burden on the tax payers.
Wake up
Tue Feb 22 2011 15:37
Not enough power for the GOP/TP yet. They want to have it ALL.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 22 2011 15:35
boo hoo. might want to save your time complaining and look for another job (one that pays market wage, not an artificially inflated one). sincerely, a taxpayer.
Anonymous
Tue Feb 22 2011 15:34
This is really about the Republican Party trying to diminish the power of Labor Unions since Labor Unions historically support Democrats. This is a politcal based attack on collective bargaining that was fought for with our forefathers blood. I am a public employee, however my postion is not represented by the union. My fellow union employees received a 4% cost of living increase, while non-union only recieved 1%. I dread to think what would happen if the union didn't support the some of the workers....we would all be totally at the mercy of Adminstration that overpays themselves while denying their employees a deent wage. Incidentally, everone's contribution to insurance went up again this year, the same amount wether you got 4% or 1% ; you see these adminstrators and Directors of the agencies have no idea of what fair and equitable means. I work for the County......and our commisssioners only want that job as a stepping stone to bigger things.




log out