Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Rape suspect dismissed from Ohio State

young.1693@osu.edu

Published: Wednesday, January 23, 2013

Updated: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 23:01


The case surrounding an alleged rape on Oct. 12 in Park-Stradley Hall has been closed because the “victim refused to cooperate,” according to the Ohio State Police logs.

The rape was reported by the victim, a female 18-year-old Park-Stradley resident. She told police she had gone to a downtown bar on the night of the alleged incident and had met a fellow Park-Stradley resident who was a “friend of a friend.” The victim and the suspect later took a taxi together back to their dorm. They both got off at the suspect’s floor to use the co-ed bathroom, where the suspect allegedly raped the victim in one of the private stalls, according to the police report.

Park-Stradley bathrooms have the same setup as six other halls on campus: Mack Hall, Canfield Hall, Bradley Hall, Paterson Hall and Scholars East and West. The co-ed bathrooms have a common sink area with multiple separate rooms off that area that each hold a toilet and a shower, OSU spokesman Dave Isaacs told The Lantern in a Jan. 8 interview.

When Park-Stradley residents returned to OSU after winter break, they found the doors to the common sink area had been removed from the bathrooms.

The doors were taken off due to feedback from residents who said they would “feel more secure if there was no divider between the hallways and that area,” Isaacs said in a Jan. 8 email.

However, that was not the only change the university decided to make after the alleged rape was reported.

The victim said in a statement to University Police she heard the suspect “had been removed from the building and suspended for 10 days.”

The suspect was “dismissed from OSU beginning Nov. 29,” according to the report.

The victim was “happy with the Student Judicial hearing,” according to the police report, and did not press criminal charges. The case was then closed, according to the report.

Moving a student to a different on-campus residence hall, removing him or her from on-campus housing and removing him or her from the university are among the disciplinary actions that can be taken in response to any nonacademic misconduct, said OSU Student Conduct director Andrea Goldblum in a Friday interview with The Lantern.

Goldblum could not discuss the specifics of any case because of the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), which prohibits the university from giving out personal information about students.

Some students living in other on-campus residence halls think the removal of the doors was appropriate given student feedback in favor of the change.

“It’s a question of safety over privacy. If (Park-Stradley residents) think the doors removed make them safer, that’s great. In exchange for a little bit of privacy, I guess that’s up to them,” said Gabrielle Smith, a Haverfield House resident and a first-year in neuroscience.

Other students agree and said the absence of bathroom doors to the common sink area will lead to increased safety.

“If there’s sort of less privacy, then people can be more aware of what’s happening inside of the bathroom. So if something like that were to happen again, it would be easier for other people on the floor to find out about it or an RA (resident adviser) to hear if something was happening,” said Jenna Mendelson, a Lincoln Tower resident and a first-year in pharmaceutical sciences.

She added that it’s important OSU administrators listen to student feedback.

“I think that’s good that the university was talking to the students about what they wanted, because if they’re feeling safer than that’s what’s most important, because they’re the ones who have to live there,” Mendelson said.

The victim and some students listed on the reports did not respond to requests for comment. Other students listed declined to comment. Hall staff members referred The Lantern to Isaacs for comment.

Multiple sex crimes were reported in Park-Stradley Fall Semester. In addition to the Oct. 12 reported rape, there was a gross sexual imposition reported on Nov. 4 that is still “investigation pending.” There was also a rape reported on Nov. 21 in Park-Stradley, but the location was later changed to Paterson Hall. The case has since been closed because the “victim refused to cooperate,” according to the University Police log.

Eight other sex crimes have been reported on OSU’s campus since the start of Fall Semester. A Sept. 9 rape in Morrill Tower is now closed, as well as a Nov. 21 rape at Mirror Lake. Rapes reported in the Neil Avenue Residence Hall on Nov. 10 and Norton House on Jan. 8 are still “investigation pending.” A Jan. 12 rape in the Neuropsychology Department is listed as “unfounded,” according to the police log.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

14 comments

Anonymous
Wed Mar 6 2013 15:41
The way to never get in trouble with a college discipline commitee or a court of law is to follow the Moral Law.
Never have a sexual relationship with anyone outside a committed marital relationship. That way you will never be falsely accused of something, and you will have no guilt.
Anonymous
Wed Mar 6 2013 14:46
The preponderance of evidence for most university conduct offices is "more likely than not," which is quite different than 'beyond a reasonable doubt." That's awesome that you apparently like to watch SVU, but educate yourself about the university conduct process before you decide to critique it based on the courts, which are COMPLETELY different processes. If a Survivor of sexual misconduct chooses not to pursue crimminal charges, the university will respect those wishes. In order to protect the community, universities have Title Nine compliance officers who are lawyers that investigate all claims of sexual misconduct, and at most institutions, employees are mandated to report any sexual misconduct to these compliance officers. These officers/lawyers answer to the federal Office of Civil Rights. To sum it up, 99.9% of you have 0 knowledge of the student conduct process, and a lot more went into this case than you realize. Educate yourself.
Anonymous
Sat Jan 26 2013 01:47
If he's actually a rapist, the school just said 'Ok. Go rape some more somewhere else. We don't care just keep us out of it.' So much for due process.

As an OSU grad, no wonder I don't contribute to the school's endowment.

Anonymous
Fri Jan 25 2013 11:30
Wow... these comments are awful and show how much work still needs to be done to change our culture's tendency to blame the victim .

As a male, heterosexual identifying student who has earned a degree in Women's, Gender, and Sexuality studies, I feel I have an obligation to address some of the blatant sexism here. Whatever your political views are, you should still have some base amount of respect for other people (yes, including women) and offer them an amount of human dignity. Feminism is not the man-hating, family-destroying philosophy that you seem to think it is. Maybe if you actually took the time to pull your head out of your silver spoon-fed backside and set foot inside a "phony women's studies" classroom, you would realize that it is hegemonic patriarchy that requires men to be dominant and encourage violence against women and not feminism. Rather feminist philosophy challenges men, as well as all people regardless of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, socioeconomic class, sexuality, religion, political affiliation, what have you to be more, to break out of the confines of identity categories and be the best self that you can be.

The university did the right thing. If you know what it is like for many sexual assault survivors in the legal system, you might understand how it is possible for a victim to "refuse to cooperate." They constantly are forced to prove something that often times provides little evidence, especially when our culture delays the reporting due to shaming, to people who know that rape convictions are hard to come by.

My thoughts are with all of the victims of sexual assault, those who have reported the crimes on campus, and those who suffer in silence.

jack
Fri Jan 25 2013 10:39
If you're male, don't go to university, that's simple. Let the universities decline to liberal arts colleges and let the women be among themselves. They will be happy, no one to date, no college romance. If you're a man, learn online, learn from friend and colleagues, get the jobs the women won't get with their phony women's studies degrees. Injustice and extorsionism eventually backfires.
Anonymous
Fri Jan 25 2013 00:23
The article assumes that the accuser is telling the truth with the repeated use of the unjustified word "victim," It's quite possible that the real victim was the man.
Anonymous
Fri Jan 25 2013 00:19
Dixon and Goss both stand for the proposition that schools ARE required to give due process, not that they get a special definition of due process that's different than the rest of the world. The distinction is that the process is more like civil process than criminal process. But why we would want to attempt to use civil process to investigate criminal offenses? Congratulations, admins, if this guy is really guilty, then you just gave a rapist a whole lot of free time.
Anonymous
Thu Jan 24 2013 16:22
Isnt this more of the anti male college mentality proposed by feminist.
antifeministsite.blogspot.com/2011/06/anti-male-college-environment.html
Anonymous
Thu Jan 24 2013 14:22
How exactly do you dismiss a suspect? They're not even guilty at that point. Only innocent.
Anonymous
Thu Jan 24 2013 11:10
What is the process used to determine guilt in these types of cases? Feminist kangaroo court?
Anonymous
Thu Jan 24 2013 10:17
Anonymous, you did read that the case was heard by the Student Judicial panel, right? There must have been enough evidence to expel...I'm guessing you tend to think the girl was asking for it, huh?
Anonymous
Thu Jan 24 2013 08:22
In contrast to the statement about the "US judicial system's dicta" , that ONLY pertains to criminal courts. Federal courts have indication over and over that university disciplinary systems need not and SHOULD NOT be the same as criminal courts. They do provide due process, just not like the criminal justice system. Refer to Dixon v. Alabama and Goss v. Lopez
Anonymous
Thu Jan 24 2013 01:25
** without due process **

Or, for that matter, what is this due process?

Anonymous
Thu Jan 24 2013 01:24
I think it's about time the Lantern actually 'report' on something rather than just regurgitate ad infinitum the police blotter. What would be most useful to the study body is an investigation as to the University's predisposition towards guilt, rather than innocence, in these types of cases. For suspending students and evicting with due process is clearly not in line with the US judicial system's dicta that one must prove guilt 'beyond a reasonable doubt'.




log out