Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Students strip down in protest

avery.82@osu.edu

Published: Monday, September 26, 2011

Updated: Friday, June 15, 2012 22:06

protestors

Todd Avery / Senior Lantern reporter

OSU students in United Students Against Sweatshops stripped down and protested in front Bricker Hall on Sept. 26, 2011.

Several Ohio State students were rooting against the Dallas Cowboys on Monday, but it had nothing to do with their football team.

A group of OSU students in United Students Against Sweatshops stripped down and protested in front of Bricker Hall on Monday in an attempt to prevent a potential apparel deal between Dallas Cowboys Merchandising and OSU.

In a group of 15 students, all sporting cardboard signs and boxes, most of the men had no shirts on while several women went with only sports bras or strapped shirts to emphasize their point.

"We would rather go naked than wear Dallas Cowboys Merchandising Apparel," said Terasia Bradford, a third-year in French and sociology.

The protest started in the basement of the Ohio Union where the students got their signs ready and moved on through the Oval while chanting "We don't give a damn for sweatshop sweatshirts" to the tune of "We Don't Give a Damn for the Whole State of Michigan."

 

The group traveled to Bricker Hall where they delivered a letter of delegation stating their demands to the secretary office of university President E. Gordon Gee before heading back to the Union.

Nicholas Pasquarello, a fourth-year in psychology and sociology and co-president of USAS at OSU, said the demands included having the Cowboys' merchandising company and its off-shoot Silver Star Merchandising, disqualified from the bidding process for an apparel deal, to have Rick VanBrimmer, director of trademarks and licensing for OSU, removed from the deal and fired and that students and faculty be allowed to participate in the decision for an apparel deal.

The University of Southern California recently signed a 10-year exclusive-merchandising deal with Silver Star Merchandising.

University spokesman Jim Lynch said in a statement Monday that OSU is currently talking to license apparel companies, including Silver Star Merchandising, about an exclusive apparel model.

USAS, however, said that Ohio State has been secretly communicating with Bill Priakos, chief operating officer for Dallas Cowboys Merchandising Ltd., since spring of 2010 in an attempt to secure the Cowboys bid.

The USAS has emails posted on their website, obtained by the Freedom of Information Act, between VanBrimmer and Priakos. In one of the emails, VanBrimmer responds to questions from Priakos about making a bid.

"The only caveat is that I may be forced into looking at ‘bids,' simply because we are a state agency. But don't fear that process," VanBrimmer wrote to Priakos.

Pasquarello said there are several problems with the deal and Silver Star Merchandising.

"Silver Star has been in communication with Rick VanBrimmer for the past year-and-a-half basically setting up the ground work for Silver Star to come in and take a monopolistic contract for OSU apparel," Pasquarello said. "It's going to wipe out the hundreds of independent contracts we already have and basically have all of our apparel solely produced by Dallas Cowboys and Nike."

Neither Silver Star Merchandising nor the Dallas Cowboy's organization were able to be reached for comment.

The last problem the USAS has, and why it first got involved against Silver Star, is it believes Silver Star is using sweatshops in several countries.

"Looking on the surface we have found four reports from the Worker Rights Consortium detailing worker abuses in Indonesia, Bangladesh and El Salvador and one from the Fair Labor Association as well," Pasquarello said.

Both are independent labor-rights organizations that monitor and try to stop the use of sweatshops by companies.

Lynch said in the university statement that OSU is a member of both organizations, is a leader on initiatives dealing with fair labor practice and has scheduled a meeting for Oct. 3 with USAS representatives to hear their concerns.

In Bradford's opinion, the university has not done enough.

"I hoped in May that the university would make some changes, but we've seen that the university doesn't actually care," Bradford said. "We are more and more like a corporation and not an institution for higher learning."

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

16 comments

Anonymous
Tue Oct 11 2011 12:19
These comments are a riot. Who really cares who makes or sells OSU apparel? The bidding process smells just about as bad as last years football scandal. Get the football program back in order and then worry about who makes the promotional merchandise. But, just like all university sports it's only about the money.
Anonymous
Fri Sep 30 2011 21:45
"I heard from someone who saw the bid they sent out to companies that the #1 criteria for decision was payouts and bonuses and the lowest criteria on the list was "commitment to the state of Ohio."

OSU's commitment to the state of Ohio should be providing a quality education at the lowest price. For every extra dollar that we spend by sourcing something from Ohio that is twice as expensive as somewhere else, the taxpayers and students have to cover the difference.

I feel bad for these students ignorance, but this is typical for college kids. They have no idea that without these "sweatshops", the people working in them would be starving and unable to support their families. Many of them moved away from their homes just get a job at the "sweatshop" and are happy with their job because its better than other options.

I have some advice to anyone who is out of job because of these situations: If you want to earn quadruple the wages of people in other parts of the world, you have to be BETTER than them. You have many more resources and opportunities than them...enroll in classes at OSU, get some job training, start a business.

Cavendishy
Thu Sep 29 2011 00:01
What some call a sweatshop is what those in developing countries call "a paycheck" or "that thing that lets me feed my family." No amount of protesting will fully modernize an economy or a labor force in a faraway country, that takes time. I do not expect a bunch of sociology and French majors to appreciate work ethic or to understand economics, but they should at least visit these countries and ask the people there which they prefer: the horrors of primitive rural farm life, or the opportunities brought by free trade? As it is, you have a bunch of middle class American kids (IOW rich people) who want to deny opportunity to some of the poorest people on the planet because you think everybody everywhere should have the same standard of living as you without any concern for the economic realities of how that standard of living is to be achieved.
Anonymous
Wed Sep 28 2011 15:13
The university should not support business that use sweatshop labor. But all that seems to matter to the leadership is money. Not only are they selling merchandizing rights to Silver Star, but they're privatizing parking. This is bad for students and workers alike.

And just because bad work is a "better choice" than no work doesn't make the situation right. If you can only choose between unemployment and work that doesn't provide a living wage, there isn't really much of a choice. If OSU, being such a powerful university, sent a message to the world by selling contracts to responsible companies that paid living wages with benefits, maybe we'd see some change.

Anonymous
Wed Sep 28 2011 08:52
So are the payouts to the university or individual? I don't think state law allows individual payouts. So if it goes to the university, you have to ask why are the payouts important. I'm guessing because Ohioans vote in politicians who cut university funding, and the difference has to be made up somewhere.
Former Lantern Reporter '97
Tue Sep 27 2011 23:11
While it is easy to attack these 'sweatshops' the economics tell a bit of a different story. Unless these workers are being held against their will and being forced to work, then they are entering into an agreement that is better than anything else going. (Not saying their working conditions or wages are great ...). So, these 'horrible' jobs are the best thing going. Also, as these factory workers give up farming and other rural occupations, this increases wages for the remaining farmers. As multi-national companies put these factories in emerging markets, they pay taxes in these countries which allows the host nation govt to improve services.

So we can attack these 'sweatshops' but trying to force their closure doesn't help anyone, here or there.

Anonymous
Tue Sep 27 2011 15:02
The University has no interest in students, workers, or Ohio - taking money out of the pockets of local ohio businesses and putting it in the coffers of Jerry Jones' sweatshop empire
Anonymous
Tue Sep 27 2011 13:41
I heard from someone who saw the bid they sent out to companies that the #1 criteria for decision was payouts and bonuses and the lowest criteria on the list was "commitment to the state of Ohio."
McDonald's State University alumni
Tue Sep 27 2011 13:25
Wow, the University seems to be selling off everything anymore.

Soon Bricker Hall will be SunLife Hall, Hopkins Hall will be Nationwide Hall, and the stadium will be known as Coca-Cola Stadium.

Is there anything we can do to stop these greedy @ssholes?

Anonymous
Tue Sep 27 2011 12:52
Thank you students for taking this on. Anyone read Guy Debord and the commodification of the spectacle?
Anonymous
Tue Sep 27 2011 12:05
These kids need to go to class
OSU parent
Tue Sep 27 2011 09:51
By eliminating the hundreds of independent contracts and replacing them with just ONE with Silver Star Merchandising does Mr. VanBrimmer's job get eliminated? Surely ONE contract can be managed by someone else. And where will we find Mr. VanBrimmer then? In Dallas, working form Silver Star of course. Mr. VanBrimmer's assertion that he "may be forced into looking at ���bids,' simply because we are a state agency" is enough to cast serious doubt on his motives for his "recommendation". It sounds like Mr. VanBrimmer's first priority is NOT the state of Ohio and OSU
Anonymous
Tue Sep 27 2011 09:06
Don't worry soon the name of the university will be something like "The Ohio State University brought to you by Coca-Cola, drink of the nation"
Jackie
Tue Sep 27 2011 09:02
No Hypocrisy? What kinda' shoes you go on there? Stunning resemblance to Nike.
Anonymous
Tue Sep 27 2011 08:23
I agree. The people at the top are selling off the next couple of generations of the University for their own personal gain.
Anonymous
Tue Sep 27 2011 07:20
Just like selling off Cost per Copy, Parking, and the airport, money talks. These exclusive 1-50 year deals are not for what is best for the univerisy, the students, or anyone except those at the top.




log out