Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Thousands swarm Statehouse protesting plan to end collective bargaining

tussel.2@osu.edu

Published: Monday, February 21, 2011

Updated: Saturday, June 16, 2012 01:06

Protest SB5

Mitch Andrews / Lantern Photographer

Protesters in oppositon of State Bill 5 flood the 3rd street entrance of the Ohio State House in downtown Columbus, Ohio, early in the afternoon of Tuesday, Feb. 23, 2011.

Thousands of protesters flooded the Ohio Statehouse on Tuesday, but many were left out in the cold.

For hours, Statehouse doors remained locked, guarded by Ohio State Troopers. Crowds protesting Senate Bill 5, which would eliminate collective bargaining for state employees, gathered outside, attempting to enter the building.

“It’s outrageous that they would lock people out of the People’s House,” state Rep. Vernon Sykes, D-Akron, told The Lantern inside the packed Statehouse. “I’ve been here since 1983; I’ve seen all kinds of demonstrations. Never have I seen people locked out of the Statehouse, highway patrol on the doors, prohibiting them from coming in.”

State Rep. Ronald Gerberry, D-Youngstown, one of three Democrats in the general assembly who were there in 1983 when collective bargaining was passed, had a similar reaction.

“I was appalled this morning, early this afternoon, when I came to the Statehouse and the doors were locked,” Gerberry told The Lantern over the roars of protesters inside the Statehouse. “In my career — this is my 23rd year in the House — I have never seen the doors locked.”

The crowd outside the Statehouse was gathering about 1 p.m., when the doors were locked, and at 3:30 p.m. the doors remained closed as protesters stood outside chanting, “Let us in!”

“We are willing to stand out here to talk,” said Steve Nash, a firefighter from Solon, Ohio, standing in 27-degree weather and light snow. “And if (Kasich is) not willing to come out, then that proves why we need collective bargaining.”

Nash, 46, traveled about 160 miles from Northeast Ohio with others from the Solon Firefighters Association, Local 2079, to protest Senate Bill 5.

State Rep. Denise Driehaus, D-Cincinnati, called the protest “democracy in action.”

“People want to participate in what’s being done,” Driehaus told The Lantern. “They want to have a voice, and so they came to the People’s House to make sure their voice is heard.”

Driehaus said a smaller protest took place at another Senate Bill 5 hearing Thursday and that the chants were so loud it was difficult to hear the deliberations.

Outside, the crowd wielded anti-Senate Bill 5 signs and chanted, “Kill the bill!” The bill they were protesting will, if passed, eliminate the collective-bargaining abilities of state workers and replace them with a merit-based system. Negotiating power of police officers, firefighters and teachers would be restricted. Police and firefighters still would not be able to strike. Teachers could still go on strike — but schools would be able to hire permanent replacements.

One teacher from the Columbus City School District said she became a teacher to serve students but that this bill would make it more difficult for her to do so effectively.

“Class size is one of the things we bargain,” said Diana Turner, 46, a member of the Ohio and Columbus education associations who teaches high school juniors and seniors. “If someone who hasn’t been in a class for years tries to come in and determine that for us, it won’t be in the best interest of the students.”

The protesters dispersed about 8 p.m., said a state patrol officer on duty at the Statehouse. The officer would not comment on why the doors had been locked.

Republicans tout the bill as an effective way to create jobs and “set the table for economic growth.”

Rob Nichols, press secretary for Gov. John Kasich, said only that Kasich supports Republican state Sen. Shannon Jones, who sponsored the bill. But on Monday, Kasich told FOX News, “We have to give local government officials a way to be more efficient and more effective in the delivery of services, and we have to give them the flexibility they need to manage their costs, including labor.”

Repeated attempts to contact Jones and Ohio State College Republicans were unsuccessful.

Democrats, on the other hand, call the bill a direct attack on the middle class, saying it will be a detriment to public servants.

“We, as students, can understand that this affects not only people who we care about,” said Matt Caffrey, president of OSU College Democrats. “If we lose this fight, we’ll be so much worse off when we graduate.”

Sykes said state workers need to keep their ability to collectively bargain.

“I was here in 1983 when we approved the collective-bargaining bill,” Sykes said. “At that time we had a lot of problems with work stoppages, with strikes. … The result was … the collective-bargaining law.”

 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

11 comments

Anonymous
Tue Mar 1 2011 15:49
Mark, you know nothing of which you speak. Collective bargaining is a right granted under Ohio Law. Let me guess, you have not read the bill?
Joe Bialek
Fri Feb 25 2011 14:30
This letter is in response to the articles covering the protests by the
Ohio Civil Service Employees Association {OCSEA}/American Federation of
State, County and Municipal Employees {AFSCME} against the attempt by
Governor John Kasich and the Legislature to eliminate collective bargaining.

Public employee collective bargaining is defined as a good-faith process
between management {Ohio Governor John Kasich } and a public employee
union {OCSEA / AFSCME} representing its employees. The two
parties negotiate wages, working hours, working conditions, etcetera. It
benefits both parties because the Governor is able to negotiate with one set
of people and it gives the State Employees Union bargaining-power.
Collective bargaining is the quintessential idea upon which the state union
system is based.

The key word here is "good-faith" and it appears to have been breached.
Evidently it wasn't good enough for the Union to agree to so many
concessions that already affects the quality of life for thousands of
employees and their families.

Now the Governor and Legislature want to take things a step further.
Kasich was quoted as saying "if lawmakers don���t dismantle public employees
collective bargaining then I will." Is this really the only solution? Has
the Governor/Legislature considered all the ways and means of reducing
government waste before destroying the very critical role collective
bargaining has played for so many years? How about increasing the
payroll tax on certain Ohio professional sports teams? After all they sure
put out a great product or service that benefits us all.

It's easy to make decisions affecting other peoples lives when those
decisions do not affect your livelihood; something that is shared by the
private sector as well. Why must the employee continue to be punished for
the mistakes of Government/Corporate leadership {or lack thereof}? When
will these "leaders" finally own up to their mistakes and share in the pain
as well? Governor Kasich, show some compassion. There are better ways to
deal with the budget shortfall. OCSEA / AFSCME, continue to protest and
know that all unions across the land are coming to support you.

Joe Bialek

Anonymous
Fri Feb 25 2011 08:10
Sen Jones? Who do you thank for your education and your successful career? How about those who protect you and your family? You have an interesting sense of gratitude.
Anonymous
Wed Feb 23 2011 15:15
Democracy = Mob Rule
United States = Representative Republic, Not a Democracy
Anonymous
Wed Feb 23 2011 14:01
FDR, the so-called people's president, the father of social security, was against the idea of labor unions for public sector employees.

"... Meticulous attention should be paid to the special relationships and obligations of public servants to the public itself and to the government. All Government employees should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service. It has its distinct and insurmountable limitations ... The very nature and purposes of Government make it impossible for ... officials ... to bind the employer ... The employer is the whole people, who speak by means of laws enacted by their representatives ...

"Particularly, I want to emphasize my conviction that militant tactics have no place in the functions of any organization of government employees. Upon employees in the federal service rests the obligation to serve the whole people ... This obligation is paramount ... A strike of public employees manifests nothing less than an intent ... to prevent or obstruct ... Government ... Such action, looking toward the paralysis of Government ... is unthinkable and intolerable."

The problem with "collective bargaining" for public employees is that the person paying the wages, the taxpayer, doesn't get to "collectively bargain". Instead, the paid lackey, or bureaucrat has this power.

BCombs212
Wed Feb 23 2011 13:51
@Mark: Do a little research buddy. There are five states that do not have collective bargaining for teachers. The HIGHEST ranking of those states in SAT average is #42 or #44, I can't recall which. If you compare budget shortfalls across all states that are experiencing them, you find that states with collective bargaining agreements and states without them have roughly the same percentage of shortfall. Private sector companies may move to RTW states, but you'll also find that those same states have lower salaries for identical positions, worse workplace safety records, and less satisfaction with employment. Of course companies move, they are profit driven. You do realize that all of these "overpaid union pigs" pay a much higher percentage of their income as taxes than all of these poor business owners that are hurt by said salaries do, right? What happens to state budgets when wages drop, and tax revenues drop with them? Are these people going to tax the rich? No. These people are going cut more services. Raise tuition. Institute more police and fire brownouts. Lay off even more workers. This is the beginning of our move to serfdom.

As a side note: I would think that as a current resident of Ohio, and one that will suffer greatly when the quality of your education takes a hit from SB5, you would realize that this bill only directly effects public sector employees. Fortunately, Ohio's police and fire departments can't just pack up and head out of state for someplace more profitable. Fortunately, all of the teachers in Ohio's public schools and universities can't just hop on buses (driven by public-sector union bus drivers. currently) and search for greener pastures.

Marks' Teacher
Wed Feb 23 2011 11:29
Teachers, firefighters and law enforcement officers making at or below poverty level are making too much? Why do republicans hate democracy so much? COLLECTIVE BARGAINING IS DEMOCRACY IN THE WORKPLACE! Without it there is only dictatorship powered by fascism.
Anonymous
Wed Feb 23 2011 11:05
Republican governors in several states are using this template to weaken or dismantle unions. However, recent polls show that Americans have no desire to turn back the clock to a time when workers were beholden to the slender mercies of those who sign their checks. Hopefully, voters are getting the message--the GOP does not represent the interests of working Americans. Remember that the next time you go to the voting booth..
Anonymous
Wed Feb 23 2011 10:15
Students are next -- Kasich's budget is likely to include major cuts to public schools, higher education, and financial aid -- and big tuition increases. To find out more check out the Defend Ohio Campus Coalition at Ohio State on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/defendohio#!/pages/Defend-Ohio-Campus-Coalition-at-Ohio-State/191675000848422)
Anonymous
Wed Feb 23 2011 08:56
Kasich = Louis XVI. He will be hated and disposed of by the next gubernatiorial election. Aren't all of you who voted for him sorry now? He shuts the people out of their statehouse!
Mark
Wed Feb 23 2011 06:23
Collective bargaining is not a right but a privilege granted by the employer. Union employees have abused this privilege it seems and have priced themselves out of work thus driving businesses out of the states with collective bargaining to states that are right to work states. The Union dinosaur is slowly becoming extinct




log out