Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Tressel's vest isn't bulletproof

Ohio State must make case to NCAA by July 5

meisel.14@osu.edu

Published: Monday, April 25, 2011

Updated: Friday, June 15, 2012 23:06

tressel pryor

Joe Podelco / Photo editor

Ohio State coach Jim Tressel and quarterback Terrelle Pryor watch the game from the field during Ohio State's 2011 Spring Game at Ohio Stadium in Columbus, Ohio, on Saturday. The offense won, 59-27.

Download PDF

The athletic department released a statement Monday, saying: "The allegations are largely consistent with what the university self-reported to the NCAA on March 8, 2011, and which were widely covered in the media. The university will continue to work cooperatively with the NCAA during the response phase to the NCAA that now begins, and will have no further comment until the process is completed."

The university has until July 5 to compile all requested documents and responses. Gee, Tressel and Smith are scheduled to meet with the NCAA Committee on Infractions on Aug. 12 in Indianapolis.

The NCAA also requested that faculty athletics representative John Bruno and director of compliance Doug Archie attend.

At the meeting, the university representatives will have the opportunity to make their case. The letter states the NCAA is most interested in Gee's presentation.

At the March 8 press conference, when asked if he ever considered firing Tressel, Gee joked that he hoped Tressel "doesn't dismiss me."

Gee told The Lantern on April 13 that he regretted making that remark.

Mark Neyland, who served more than three years on the NCAA Enforcement staff and provides counsel on NCAA infractions, said a postseason ban could be in store once the NCAA makes its final decisions.

"The Committee on Infractions is in the business of trying to make the penalties fit the crime," Neyland told The Lantern. "Because a postseason ban is one of the more severe penalties, it is generally reserved to the types of violations that the committee deems to be most egregious."

Buckner said OSU fans should prepare to see the team's 2010 victories vanquished.

"Based on the information that we have available right now, I do think there's a possibility that those contests in which ineligible student-athletes participated, those games could be vacated," Buckner said. "I think Ohio State fans need to understand that that may be a possibility."

In its letter, the NCAA asked OSU to detail a list of past NCAA infractions, distinguishing the university as a "repeat offender."

Quarterback Troy Smith accepted $500 from a booster and was suspended for the 2004 Alamo Bowl and the first game of the 2005 season.

Former men's basketball coach Jim O'Brien violated NCAA rules when he financially supported a potential recruit.

"Ohio State is still within the repeat violators statute, which is five years from the last major rules violation," Buckner said. "According to what has been recorded in those violations, I don't think that the committee is going to come out and use the repeat violators statute because there's no indication that the institution was directly involved in the violations or didn't do enough to monitor. There wasn't institutional breakdown. Those weren't alleged by the enforcement staff.

"I think what you're going to see is this be taken care of in a narrow focus by the Committee on Infractions dealing with the student-athletes, possible vacation of those contests and coach Tressel directly."

Ally Kraemer, Trent Barter and Pat Brennan contributed to this story. 

Correction: This article quoted Gee as saying he hoped Tressel "doesn't fire me." In fact, Gee said he hoped Tressel "doesn't dismiss me."

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

46 comments

Anonymous
Thu Apr 28 2011 10:12
Coach Tressell is a good Christian man. My prayers are with and for him and his family during this cruel time.
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 16:09
I'm with you 1000%, coach!
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 16:02
Wow. I did not realize that so many fans hated Coach Tressell.
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 15:59
"And this, too, shall pass."
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 15:34
There seems to be an awful lot of Michigan fans making posts here or at least Buckeye fans who are drunk on Michigan Koolaid! Let me guess: getting rid of Tressel is your best plan for winning the season finale against Ohio State? Unfortunate for you, TOSU has already decided not to fire Tressell. TOSU only wanted to suspend him for two non-conference games! And I doubt the NCAA is going to base its decision on what fans post on this article. So, why don't you take your Ohio State-Jim Tressell bashing elsewhere. This newspaper is by and for Ohio State and we proudly support our footbal program, which happens to include our football coach!
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 15:17
Has anyone considered that perhaps the reason Coach Tressel forwarded the e-mail from Ciscero to Sarniak was so that Sarniak could convince Pryor into fessing up to Tressell (if the accusations were true) and then Tressell wouldn't have to divulge his confidential and uncorroborated source (Ciscero)? Why does everyone have to jump to the wrong conclusions that require assuming the worst? Is this an Ohio State publication or one from that school Up North?
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 15:01
Where were all of these pompous Tressell haters when everyone was holding "In Tressell We Trust" signs? I guess the bandwagon slowed down and they jumped to another bandwagon! Here's an idea: try thinking for yourselves and usihg some common sense instead of kicking a person when he's down and judging with unreasonable standards that you wouldn't use on anyone else!
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 14:54
With regard to the various players' eligibility, which seems to be the crux of the accusations against Jim Tressel for allowing them to play, perhaps he thought the players hadn't had enough training on the relevant NCAA rules. Isn't that precisely what the NCAA determined concerning their eligibility to play in the Sugar Bowl? Why should we expect Tressell to have looked at the same rules and came to a different conclusion that would decisively disfavor Ohio State?
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 14:44
WWJD: Judge not l'est ye be judged! (Mt. 7:1-6)
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 14:41
Somebody with the Lantern should ask Earl Bruce or John Cooper if winning isn't everything when it comes to Ohio State football!
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 14:36
Here's a question for all of you self-annointed morality judges: suppose someone told you in confidence that a mutual friend's girlfriend was cheating on him with another friend. Since the information was unconfirmed, shouldn't better judgment be to not tell the friend about his unfaithful girlfriend until the facts are verified-- even if you engage in gossiping/ forwarding the gossip to yet another friend. Wouldn't you feel bad if you told the friend and he reacted with a murder-suicide. Sometimes it's best to verify first. I think that's what Coach Tressel did but it makes for a better story to say he knowingly and purposely played known ineligible players because he was more concerned with winning than doing what was right! Who are you to say what was right when you weren't there!
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 14:23
The last time I checked, not acting on a confidential e-mail tip is not a capital offense... LOL
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 14:17
Give me a break! Does anyone really think a $250,000 fine and 5-game suspension isn't commensurate to the offense? Some of you seem to act like you think he should be sitting on Death Row!
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 14:14
I wonder how many of the Tressell-haters would be wanting to crucify him had he benched Pryor and Posey based on unsubstantiated rumors, especially if the rumors turned out to be wrong! These self-righteous hypocrites need to take a good long look into a mirror at themselves!
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 14:07
Speaking of "getting over it," let's look at just what Tressel did that was so terrible that so many haters can't get over: he received a confidential uncorroborated e-mail tip that some of his players might have violated minor NCAA rules and forwarded the e-mail to one of the players' mentor. Then he went on to play the players instead of benching them because he wasn't formally advised of any alleged wrongdoing. His so-called BIG lie was that he didn't report what he wasn't sure was a breach of confidentiality. He was protecting the attorney and the integrity of a federal investigation-- not the players!
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 13:33
do you ohio state fans read this stuff, I am not an Ohio State fan or hater, but this is a joke, how anyone can defend this person in light of what he did. And the excuses that you come up with to try and justify what he did are just plain stupid. Act like a responsible adult (if you are) and accept the fact he lied to try and protect his players so he could win more games. Nothing wrong of being proud to be a Buckeye, but your loyality is blinding your reasoning.
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 13:10
I'm amazed so many so-called Buckeyes are OK with someone who has embarrassed our school's image and broke rules without regard.
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 12:22
I am amazed that so many so-called Buckeyes can so easily throw a good man like Tressell under the bus the way they have!
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 11:30
Not only is Tressell's vest not bulletproof, by all of the negative posts it's plain to see that it's obviously not knife proof (in the back where needed most)!
Anonymous
Wed Apr 27 2011 11:16
I never realized that so many Wolverines read and commented on Lantern articles!




log out