Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Letter to the editor: Apology for ad demanded

Published: Sunday, October 28, 2012

Updated: Sunday, October 28, 2012 21:10

Letter to the editor

As students of this great university and daily readers of The Lantern, we were disappointed, appalled and honestly disgusted by the advertisement it chose to run on Oct. 24. The advertisement in question was written and paid for by FLAME — Facts and Logic About the Middle East — an organization that is notorious for publishing contentious blurbs vilifying Palestinians and all Muslims — two factions that are deeply engrained in The Ohio State University’s campus and culture.

The Lantern, like many of its newspaper and media counterparts, desires to preserve the freedoms of speech and press that are enumerated in the First Amendment of our sublime Constitution; however, the advertisement in question was a blatant and inflammatory form of hate speech — a form of speech that is explicitly unprotected in our Bill of Rights. The advertisement asserts that all Muslims and Iranians are “crazies” and that Allah commands Muslims to “kill Jews and other infidels, whatever the cost.” This is not only completely false, but it is a malignant and clear attempt at generating hatred toward Muslims. As a point of reference, the Supreme Court has ruled that not all speech is protected, or even legal in our country — precedent was set in 1969 with the Brandenburg v. Ohio case, which states that the First Amendment does not defend inflammatory speech “that is directed to inciting and likely to incite imminent lawless action.”

Adding to the magnitude of this situation is the fact that our outstanding institution has been tarnished with hate crimes and the profuse proliferation of hate speech among our student body over the course of the past two school years, exemplified by the OSU Haters Tumblr account. The Lantern is the official newspaper of Ohio State, and it is also sponsored and promoted by the university, thus everything it chooses to print inherently represents our university’s views and positions. The Lantern has an obligation to review everything that it publishes, including advertisements, for accuracy — a duty that is expected for all professional organizations and forms of print. It also has the onus of upholding the democratic values of our nation, which unequivocally exclude the use of hate speech, and it has absolutely failed in this instance. Unfortunately, this is not the first time The Lantern has printed advertisements that promote anti-Islamic sentiments, and The Ohio State University’s Muslim Student Association has decided to take a stand against The Lantern’s erroneous activity. From this point forward, we are refusing to patronize The Lantern until it takes an unambiguous stance against this type of speech, changes its flawed policy in regards to publishing advertisements and prints an apology to the thousands of Muslims and Iranians on our campus that were falsely accused of being crazy murderers.

The Ohio State University’s Muslim Student Association
 

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

15 comments

Wow
Sun Jan 6 2013 22:00
Just to reiterate here: the mindless, stupid remarks in this comment section make zero sense and are a sad reminder that simpletons never hesitate to spout their ignorance.

Islam is not a threat to any free society. Bigotry, however, is.

Arafat
Tue Nov 6 2012 16:39
Universal Human Rights

With regard to human rights, the American founding fathers rightly believed that equality, free speech, and religious freedom, are universal and inalienable. Such rights are granted by God, not by government. Consequently they cannot be abridged or revoked by government. This view is rejected by Islamists.

In defiance of the U.N.'s 1948 Universal Declaration of Human Rights,[22] Islamists recognize only those rights which are narrowly granted under Shariah law by the Quran and the Hadith (the traditional account of the life and sayings of Mohammed, written many years after his death.). This alternative view of human rights was clearly set forth in the 1990 Cairo Declaration, endorsed by all 57 member Organization of Islamic Cooperation.[23] In Shariah compliant cultures, such as Saudi Arabia and Iran, inequalities between men and women, or Muslims and non-Muslims, are the rule rather than the exception. Women, Christians, Jews, polytheists and especially atheists are regarded as socially, legally, and even mentally inferior to Muslim men.[24]

While Christianity and Judaism teach that all people should be treated with kindness and respect because they are created in God's image (see Matthew 5:43-44, 1 John 4:20), the Quran forbids friendship with unbelievers (Quran 5:51)[25] and considers it unlawful even to give them charity (zakat).[26] Non-Muslims are forced to embrace Islam or be reduced to dhimmis - second-class citizens. Under Shariah law, dhimmitude is a form of subjugation, which limits the social, religious, legal, and economic rights of non-believers, and imposes a special tax burden on them as a penalty for rejecting Islam.

Anonymous
Mon Nov 5 2012 22:34
Wow, so a bunch of MSA presidents turned out to be terrorists and Muslims on campus blame the newspaper for it! Talk about ridiculous. Maybe you should be more upset that your religion has been hijacked by hatred than at the people who reveal that fact? Stick to oppressing ideas and people in your home countries, because logic and free speech are clearly beyond your grasp conceptually! The fact most of you deny the holocaust shows how hateful and pathetic you truly are.
Hippies Smell
Mon Nov 5 2012 17:19
Islamos-supremacism apologists can't refute the cited evidence that MSA has a long history of conspiring with Muslim Brotherhood affiliates to host serial hate-mongers and create a hostile educational environment in violation of campus policy.
www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6175

So instead Glorngo emolates a silly strawman of "Holocaust denial" in a vane attempt to distract readers from the facts.

Rubbish. The FLAME paid advertisement does nothing of the sort. Quite the contrary, it condemns Islamo-supremacists who are (in fact) purveyors of incitement to terrorism.

Many student newspapers across this country print FLAME advertisements. Are they all full of closet bigots, too?

Try harder to avoid leveling moronic accusations and demanding apologies without a shred of credibility to back them.

This affaire has degenerated from farce to tragedy. But the sunshine of Truth is the best disinfectant and it's passed time that academia exposed this whole bizarre charade.

The Latern advertising department should republish the FLAME ad every day until these MSA thugs withdraw their bullying censure and issue an apology of their own.
Glorngo
Mon Nov 5 2012 10:03
The majority of the remarks in this comments section are vapidly stupid.

College newspapers are, unfortunately, tricked on a rather regular basis into printing the kind of trashy FLAME "ads" that The Lantern chose to publish. There's a guy, Bradley Smith, that goes around trolling college newspapers doing a similar thing (even managing to hoodwink The Jambar and Harvard Crimson), except he's into Holocaust denial. What that has in common with what The Lantern chose to do is simple: a bunch of college students on the editorial board were unable to discern that broadcasting advertisements for misinformation is wrong.

I don't know what went through the heads of The Lantern's staff when they gave the go ahead to publish some whackjob's intolerance in their paper but what I do know is this: it was a foolish decision. Freedom of speech and freedom of the press come with corresponding obligations of common sense and judgment.

The Lantern has an apology to issue. Immediately.

Ganesha akbar
Mon Nov 5 2012 09:27
seriously?

Cluebat to Anonymous: "Ganesha akbar" isn't a name. It's a pseudonym... kinda' like (say) "Anonymous".

But I accept your inability to rebut the cited evidence of MSA Islamo-supremacism as a clear proof of your intellectual bankruptcy.

Thanks for playing. buh-bye

Grade: F- (fatuous)
Anonymous
Sun Nov 4 2012 22:35
I just hope you know that with a name like Ganesha akbar!, no one is going to take you seriously.
MSA unveiled
Thu Nov 1 2012 07:48
For those interested in full disclosure of these Muslim Brotherhood affilitates, read their dossier @
www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=7404
Lan astaslem
Thu Nov 1 2012 07:38
MSA thugs are essentially demanding restrictions on the freedom of speech and the creation of a special, privileged class that is beyond criticism.

That is the death of free society and the road to tyranny; for the class that is beyond criticism will have a free hand to do and say whatever it wants, while the rest of us are muzzled.

Lan astaslem!
Ganesha akbar!
Thu Nov 1 2012 07:34
It should be clear by now that MSA has a long history of conspiring with Muslim Brotherhood affiliates to host serial hate-mongers and create a hostile educational environment in violation of campus policy.

And now MSA leadership has the temerity to climb up on their collective hind legs and howl about (alleged) "hate speech"?

Rubbish. The FLAME paid advertisement does nothing of the sort. Quite the contrary, it condemns Islamo-supremacists who are (in fact) purveyors of incitement to terrorism.

Many student newspapers across this country print FLAME advertisements. Are they all full of closet bigots, too?

Try harder to avoid leveling moronic accusations and demanding apologies without a shred of credibility to back them.

This affaire has degenerated from farce to tragedy. But the sunshine of Truth is the best disinfectant and it's passed time that academia exposed this whole bizarre charade.

The Latern advertising department should republish the FLAME ad every day until these MSA thugs withdraw their bullying censure and issue an apology of their own.
Anonymous
Thu Nov 1 2012 07:22
I think that is reaching for an excuse to demand an apology. Crying NAZI isn't going to help you win an argument. This ad was not inciting imminent lawless action.
Jim Stevens (yes that's my real name)
Wed Oct 31 2012 15:34
Inciting imminent lawless action? Hmm. Let's think back to other historical examples of similarly hateful, false speech inciting violence...

WORLD WAR II and the NAZIS.

Just sayin'. What started as some inflammatory rhetoric turned into the wholesale slaughter (quite literally) of over 6 million human beings. And that's JUST the Jews murdered then. How did it all start? Oh, well someone (actually a lot of someones, including some rather famous authors and artists) occasionally wrote a piece for a newspaper (eerily similar, no?) talking about what horrible people they perceived Jews to be. Y'know, eating Christian children or drinking their blood. Zionist financial conspiracies. No biggie.

Let us now return to the reality of human nature, Mr./Ms. Anonymous.

The difference between your random someone on the street and THIS example is that the random someone a.) addressed you directly, and b.) had an intended audience of, give or take, JUST YOU. In the ad questioned by this letter, the intended audience was well more than simply one person, or even just the allegedly bad people. And instead, it was directed at like-minded people (to the FLAME folks, not their objects of HATE SPEECH). The point of calling YOU crazy is much different from that of telling tens (maybe hundreds) of thousands of people that you're crazy. Or, worse, that you're a child-molesting terrorist just waiting to suck the blood from their children.

Y'know, the usual.

Anonymous
Tue Oct 30 2012 00:20
Please tell me where this incites "imminent lawless action?" The lawyers in MSA need to get their JD's first.

Regardless of how offensive this ad is, it is not hate speech. If I call someone who walks past me a "crazy"on the street, is that hate speech?

Anonymous
Mon Oct 29 2012 20:48
Based on this stupid statement - "The advertisement asserts that all Muslims and Iranians are "crazies" and that Allah commands Muslims to "kill Jews and other infidels, whatever the cost."
Common sense tells me if it was true, then there would be no infidels on this planet earth alive.
It is a shame that a certain community or group are demonized by false propaganda....
Jim Stevens
Mon Oct 29 2012 12:19
Agreed. FLAME could choose its message's words much more carefully. Whether they intend to portray all Muslims as 'crazies' or not, their ads (also frequently seen in other college publications, I might add) come across as just that. What's the old saying about honey and vinegar?




log out