Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Suggestions for better Oscars show

miller.4410@osu.edu

Published: Friday, March 12, 2010

Updated: Friday, March 12, 2010 16:03

I sat down in my recliner in front of a TV showing the Oscars, expecting to fall asleep within 15 minutes. That is what normally happens when I am confronted with those types of situations. It is my body's natural defense mechanism against boredom.


So I was pleasantly surprised when, after watching for a couple hours, I was still awake and entertained.


But, despite my surprise acceptance of the awards show, I still was able to find areas for improvement. Though I never would want the job, if I was responsible for running the Oscar ceremony, a few changes would be made. These are some of my provisions:


1. Limit the amount of thanks. After receiving an Oscar, a person is only allowed to thank five people. Nobody knows the people being thanked anyway, so it only makes sense to reduce them and save valuable time. An actor or actress who forgets to thank someone in particular would have an excuse because they were only allowed so many to begin with.


2. Decrease time for acceptance speeches. This goes along with No. 1, but is an additional time-saving mechanism. Along with the five thank-yous, winners will be allowed to give a speech equal in length to a 160-character Tweet.


3. Limit the cameras from lingering on any particular person. Granted, some people deserve more attention than others, but sometimes the camera takes this liberty too far. Viewers can only look at James Cameron or Maggie Gyllenhaal for so long before gouging their eyes out.


4. Group similar awards together. This also is meant for time purposes. It may seem like I am belaboring the point, but when it takes a show nearly four hours to hand out 24 awards, some trimming is necessary. Awards for sound editing and sound mixing will be combined into "Best Sound." The same will be done to original song and original score: "Best Music."


5. Group together awards that nobody cares about. Devoting entire segments to makeup, film editing and foreign language films is not going to cut it. These types of categories will be mentioned together and the winners will line up single-file to claim their Oscar.


6. Rearrange order in which awards are given. It seems senseless for the first award to be "Best Supporting Actress." The show should gradually build up to the end. Therefore, awards for supporting actor and actress will be given just before the best actor and actress are named.


7. Add new categories. Under my supervision an Oscar will be handed out for the "Best Video Montage." They were huge in the ‘80s, and everyone likes an occasional montage to speed up tedious parts of a movie. Also, seeing as they are becoming so popular, another Oscar will be given to the "Most Resilient Zombie."


More changes will be needed later, but this is a good start.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

5 comments

Anonymous
Mon Mar 15 2010 17:18
Wow, no one cares about foreign language films in your world? What world are you living in?
pldrake MCRP '74
Mon Mar 15 2010 16:09
I enjoyed this year's show and was glad music did not interrupt acceptance speeches. One person speaking per award would help and avoid that incident that seemed like gate crashing for one of the documentary awards. These awards are very special for the recipients; let them have their time to glory in their achievement.
Anonymous
Mon Mar 15 2010 09:13
Really, Seriously, Really
Anonymous
Mon Mar 15 2010 08:51
Award shows are boring to me, so I dont attempt to watch them or make recommendations on what they should do to cater to my tastes. That would be like me telling American Idol to have only indie rockers and brit pop. Yes, that would make it great for me, but that is not their established audience and would draw less viewers than they currently draw. If you don't enjoy, just don't watch!
Samantha
Mon Mar 15 2010 01:04
1. There are time limits for acceptance speeches. The winners simply do not follow them.

2. Although new awards have been added over the years, I think awards like "Best Video Montage" should be reserved for less serious awards ceremonies. (P.S. Montage refers to editing in film, and the term is not exclusive to those segments in 80s movies.)

3. Why shouldn't makeup artists and editors be praised equally as actors and directors? Their contributions are often overlooked and the awards ceremony is a way to spotlight their work.

4. If you're bored with the Oscars, why do you watch the show?

Originally, the Academy Awards ceremony was much shorter and not heavily publicized. With the advent of television, it became a big event. A large amount of the four hours is dedicated to commercials, an indication of how many people watch annually.







log out