Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

Ohio State, NCAA, 'Shameful Six' are embarrassments

freking.4@osu.edu

Published: Friday, December 24, 2010

Updated: Saturday, June 16, 2012 01:06

Two days before Christmas, six Buckeye players played the role of the Grinch. They, along with the other parties involved, have completely embarrassed themselves.

The "Shameful Six" should be embarrassed. They sold jerseys, pants, shoes, Big Ten championship rings and Gold Pants awards. In a true sense of irony, Terrelle Pryor sold his 2009 Fiesta Bowl sportsmanship award. Many of them received discounted services (tattoos) in exchange for autographs.

Ohio State athletic director Gene Smith should be embarrassed. He said that the now-suspended players "stated in their interviews with us and with the NCAA that they felt those items were theirs, that they owned them, that they could sell them to help their families. … We were not explicit, and that's our responsibility to be explicit."

I wasn't born yesterday. Neither were the players. You'll never convince me that the players truly thought it was OK to sell those items.

I talked to Gene Smith about compliance in May. I asked him what the key to staying clear of the NCAA was. He gave me a one-word answer: "attitude."

"Our compliance office does a great job with education, not only our department but across the campus and in the community," Smith said. "So we have a compliance-conscious environment because I drive it, I talk about it all the time."

Maybe the "Shameful Six" just had the wrong attitude.

The NCAA should also be embarrassed.

OSU declared the "Shameful Six" ineligible when it self-reported the violations to the NCAA on Sunday. It was the NCAA who reinstated the six for the Sugar Bowl and instead suspended five of the six for the first five games of the 2011 season (Jordan Whiting is suspended for the season opener).

Why? Since 2007, OSU has not made it crystal clear that selling "apparel, awards and gifts issued by the athletics department" is a no. Which brings us back to the players thinking they weren't breaking any rules.

It gets better.

The NCAA bought that poppycock excuse and used lingo Smith hadn't even heard of: "NCAA policy allows [lifting] penalties for a championship or bowl game if it was reasonable at the time the student-athletes were not aware they were committing violations."

To a greater extent, it's the Cam Newton excuse. Sure, there was no clear-cut proof connecting Newton to his father's pay-for-play recruitment of his son. You'll never convince me that discussion of the highest bidder didn't happen at the Newton dinner table.

And let me get this straight: current USC Trojans can't play in a bowl game because former player and Heisman winner Reggie Bush took improper benefits five years ago?

Pryor, Dan Herron, DeVier Posey and Mike Adams are all not only eligible for the 2011 NFL draft, it's a virtual certainty that all four of them would be drafted.

Now, do their suspensions look bad on their resumes? Sure. Is it a big risk entering the NFL with no collective bargaining agreement deal in place? Definitely.

But the fact that they can jump ship after the Sugar Bowl and not have to worry about their suspensions is ludicrous.

Scandal-heavy and money-hungry college football is becoming more of an embarrassment by the day.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

21 comments

Anonymous
Tue Mar 29 2011 12:24
Would it have been legal if the players gave the articles that they sold to their parents and then the parents sold them?????????????
Keb
Sat Mar 19 2011 00:33
This all is a bunch of Crap. The NCAA is a PIMP! Those players had no money because they are not permitted to work. That would be a pay off, so they sold stuff that to all of us would be a big deal. Go back to being 20 yrs. old, I always had a job & money in my pocket because I could work. These boys do not have any money & most of their families do not have it to give to them.
Anonymous
Tue Mar 15 2011 11:00
As someone who stood by Tressel's decision to let these players play, I look back at another idiotic post by Mr. Ferking, who pretends to know the hearts and minds of those he has never met.

Signing day has come and gone, and the six are still at Ohio State, ready to serve their sentences.

Anonymous
Mon Jan 10 2011 15:26
Are you kidding? when did 5 become 6... can you count or are you just ranting to rant?
Anonymous
Sun Jan 2 2011 19:39
Selling their awards was classless, but a 5 game suspension is silly when players convicted of DUI this year got 2 games (Ilinois) or 1 game (Oklahoma State & West Virginia). The Tressel compromise - "stay next year or skip the trip" was brilliant; any of these guys that renege will be persona non gratis in Ohio
Anonymous
Tue Dec 28 2010 18:34
I've met Pryor and am not surprised. He came to OSU as a prima dona. He's been a prima dona while here and I don't think he will play in the Sugar Bowl, and for all that OSU has done for him, I wish him well in the NFL, IF anyone wants him!. I think that what he did this time was embarrassing to OSU, it's alumni, the employees and most of all, other athletes. No, he was not the only one who succumed to greed, and several of the others knew better. Posey, Herron, I'm just totally surprised they would stoop so low. The QB is someone that people look up to. Not Pryor anymore. The items sold were an award as to the greatness of their abilities as a whole team. Not as an individual. I'm sure that Tressell is very disappointed. I am too.
Anonymous
Tue Dec 28 2010 16:59
These 5 can finish their education anytime in their future. Right now they need to go straight to the NFL. NCAA is being rediculous.
Gold pants
Tue Dec 28 2010 13:11
Free the Shameful Six ...........from their obligations to the university. Bye-bye!
Lil' Jimmy Tressel
Mon Dec 27 2010 23:21
Sadly, this is probably the biggest "completion" of Pryor's Buckeye career. Now we can add him to the NCAA commercial that says "Most of us will be going pro in something other than sports", because I can't see an NFL QB job waiting for him after this bowl game.
J Day 1974
Sun Dec 26 2010 10:36
Perhaps Mr. Pryor, et al, should sit down in a room with several member of the 1990s OSU teams and explain to them how meaningless the gold pants and Big Ten Championship rings are...
BuckEye
Sat Dec 25 2010 21:33
Who cares? It's their stuff and they should have the right to do whatever they want with it. These kids make so much money for the school I believe they should have the right to make money off their own possessions. The NCAA is a joke.
People are too extreme and sensitive about this issue. It's not your awards and possessions they're selling. It's their stuff.
8nw3m
Fri Dec 24 2010 13:53
Why has everyone forgotten about that Heisman Trophy winners alleged cheating at another college and not investigated by the NCAA?
Anonymous
Fri Dec 24 2010 13:43
I think that the NCAA and University are entirely suspect in their behavior concerning this matter but I want to know at what point does an NCAA athlete sign away their right to property? In effect. the University gave them gifts, and when they exercised their Constitutionally-guaranteed right to dispose of their own property as they wish, possibly induced by the recession, they get burned for it? I know that they cannot be making money from their own celebrity through endorsements, etc. but when it is their OWN PROPERTY?
Regardless of whether they knew it was wrong or not, it is obvious that the NCAA's decision with allowing them to play, as well as Cam Newton to play in his own respective Bowl game is COMPLETELY MOTIVATED BY MONEY. The NCAA asked itself, "How much money are we going to lose ourselves and our advertisers if we suspend the Heisman-winner from the National Championship and the some of the Buckeyes' best from their own game?" It's a sham from start to finish and the NCAA needs to adopt real principles in tune with today's college game instead of continuing on with the draconian, convoluted system of slapped-together slave laws that even punishes the home team for making a positive, celebratory gesture to the fans.
Anonymous
Fri Dec 24 2010 13:40
boring. college players should be consider professional performers!
Anonymous
Fri Dec 24 2010 11:09
If Ohio State plays these players in the Sugar Bowl, it is no better than the SEC schools about whom they like to rail. It is time for Gene Smith and Coach Tressel to "Walk the Talk" or stop this charade of Ohio State conducting its program on some higher ethical and moral level. As for the players involved, I never want to see you shame the university again by wearing the scarlet and gray uniforms. You want material possessions? Fine, turn pro and see how well you do!
Anonymous
Fri Dec 24 2010 10:26
@OLIN: I agree it is disrespectful to their teammates and university to sell accomplishments that were earned as a single unit. however mentioning Kirk as a champion and in the same breath as Archie no less is completely laughable. Kirk was not a good college QB, just saying. Hopefully the team can rise above this, Go Bucks!
OLIN
Fri Dec 24 2010 10:06
Tattoo University
Our athletic department should be ashamed! Seven full-time staff to teach the players to respect the rules. And to think that awards such as gold pants and championship rings mean nothing to those that receive them,shame,shame. What happened to the great champions like Archie and Kirk who love Ohio State! Are they all just money grabbers?
Anonymous
Fri Dec 24 2010 08:28
@OSUAlum: I don't feel bad for those boys and what they get in compensation for playing. Many of them get full ride scholarships, and from what I heard in the interview yesterday on TV, they also tend to get money to go out on dates as well. These guys don't need to pick up an extra job to make ends meet, and those rules are there to keep the University from over working them. Because if you think about it, its like a grad-student deal: you work for the University, and in turn the University lets you stay there and take classes. I AM ashamed that these boys decided to go against the rules for extra cash, and yes, they ought to know better. I'd rather see us lose the bowl game than to lets these boys go unpunished.
Anonymous
Fri Dec 24 2010 08:02
Considering the "character" of the NFL, these guys are more than ready to fit right in to that sewer. Now, if we can prove multiple children by multiple women, they'd also be ready for the NBA.
OSUAlum
Fri Dec 24 2010 06:29
GIven what college football players are paid for playing NFL development-league football, plus the ludicrous rules governing their in-college employment prospects and prohibition from going to the NFL less than 3 years after high school, I completely understand why they sold their stuff. Also, it's just stuff - can't change what they did to earn them.




log out