Home » Campus » Experts: Latest school shooting changes conversation to ‘education, not just gun violence’

Experts: Latest school shooting changes conversation to ‘education, not just gun violence’

Ohio State police department cruisers parked outside Blankenship Hall on West Campus. Credit: Jack Westerheide | Photo Editor

Gun rights and possible legislative reform dominate discussion among students and politicians and on social media in light of the Feb. 14 shooting spree that left 17 dead in Parkland, Florida. While talk of what can be done after violent incidents often occurs, the intensity in which it has stemmed this time differs. Talk has ranged from stricter gun laws to arming teachers with guns in case of emergency.

Around 30 Ohio school districts include guns in their campus security plans, meaning staff members are trained to use the weapons should a shooting occur. Eight days after the shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, President Donald Trump called for arming teachers in order to prevent further incidents.

However, arming teachers with weapons has not been proven to deter gun violence in schools, according to research by Bryan Warnick, a professor of philosophy education at Ohio State. Warnick’s work instead supports the notion that providing teachers with guns would instead create an atmosphere that is accepting of violence that so often stems from the weapon.

This change in attitude can lead teachers to think of their students not as learners, but potential shooters, his research shows.

In conjunction with professors from the University of British Columbia and Utah Valley University, Warnick published research in 2010 on school shootings beginning in 1978 and ending with the violence at Columbine High School in 1999, using a variety of sources and studies.

“We were trying to figure out what was going on in schools themselves that may have contributed to the violence that took place with an eye toward, if schools are playing a part, what we could do differently,” Warnick said.

His work questions why educational reform isn’t part of the response to a school shooting — something Warnick and his co-authors found to be necessary for change.

“Current policy responses do not address the fundamental question of why so many mass shootings take place in schools,” Warnick said in a recently published opinion piece. “To answer this question, we need to get to the heart of how students experience school and the meaning that schools have in American life.”

Five educational institutions, including Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School, have been the sites of some of the deadliest mass shootings in the country since 2005: Sandy Hook Elementary School in 2012; Northern Illinois University in 2008; Virginia Tech in 2007; and a Pennsylvania Amish schoolhouse in 2006.

For the past three years, schools in Sidney, Ohiotrained teachers to use firearms in response to a shooting in its security plan. Filmmaker and former high school teacher Kate Way has been exploring the impact of those policies in “G is for Gun: The Arming of Teachers in America,” a documentary in the process of being produced with Julie Akeret.

“This has become a conversation about education, not just gun violence,” Way said. “K-12 schools and universities are supposed to be spaces of free thought and growth and learning, and guns can get in the way of that.”

While the conversation is sure to continue, Warnick said the discussion in schools matters when it comes to preventing shootings from continuing to occur.

“Certainly the easy availability of guns and our mental health infrastructure contribute to school shootings even more,” he said. “But … what goes on in schools does matter, and that aspect of the conversation wasn’t represented very well in this social discourse.”


  1. I’m open to any reasonable long term solution, but the recent shooting in Florida isn’t the first, nor will it be the last, if we do not provide immediate and clear protection for our children

    We protect OSU football games, government offices, banks, grocery stores and money transported in armored trucks, yet we turn our backs on children in schools. This is not a gun problem, nor an NRA problem. It is a security problem. The system failed over and over again, with Florida’s failures beginning when the shooter was nine years old and continuing with trained Sheriff’s deputies failing to do their job. The system failed and it will continue to do so within government bureaucracies. It always does.

    I support protecting every school with trained and vetted adults. I welcome law enforcement, veterans, teachers and staff to participate in this common sense approach. The long term solutions may take a generation more more to come to fruition. Hopefully one day the need to have armed security in schools goes away. In the meantime, take politics out of this and implement the known means of protection we have used for decades.

    Pat Manley
    Parent and Candidate for U.S. Congress, Ohio District 12

  2. I am a future Ohio State student and resident of a community that neighbors Parkland, Florida. The tragedy has sent shockwaves of sorrow and dismay throughout the South Florida community. Simply put, since this tragedy, sadness abounds. On the afternoon of February 14, we were all preparing for the end of another day as news about an active shooting spread throughout my classroom via social media with the massacre occurring just 11 miles south at Marjory Stoneman Douglas HS. People on social media were receiving and sharing videos of the nightmare our friends were going through in real time long before they were available to the news media. Across our social medias, we saw videos of terrified students screaming and hiding as the sound of gunshots echoed in their hallways, and videos depicting wounded and dead bodies. We watched in disbelief only to be hit with the reality of it as we headed home to sounds of helicopters flying above and news of those who were lost.

    Our state is now trying to pass legislation that would arm teachers. Many of us students in the South Florida community are very much opposed to this idea and I am glad to see research done by Professor Bryan Warnick that supports our position. Numerous student-led initiatives have been formed in hope for change and fear-free schools, including a letter-writing campaign called 535 Letters for Change that me and 6 other friends started.

    Mitchell Pinsky
    Public Affairs ’22

  3. Here’s a thing, you won’t get rid of shootings unless you ban guns. I saw https://edureviewer.com/services/edubirdie-com-review/ talking about a great article review on gun laws education, so you should check them out. In short, many people say that if the USA ban guns, only criminals will have access to them, meaning peaceful citizens won’t be able to protect themselves. What’s important is that, a seemingly peaceful citizen with no criminal background might be plotting something cruel. Having no criminal history, they will get a gun. Sounds dangerous, right? Seems like no one cares about situations like this hence why we have shootings

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.